From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A68D23890 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 19804 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2024 07:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 19771 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2024 07:40:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713944410; x=1714549210; darn=lists.openwall.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vLgiHI2eQmBCSmXpDk9d23h+nM0x8tNstFRFZLS56zg=; b=KFNji3wWgGr2BhFWD4OhotP+6Zt0DNxdOLoMmcJ4ffl5mad8NipKOVi4XndUlHupQv NaMsZONgkg0K7XDkwqCjSDMVO8ZR4cMcHHkzfw9sseJRnhzgLaYRFS4J8+vcJ4O4hlSN juXP7xeRw2iaIDm6YYgEBtUkkNJ9VC0olvLPMiJ0vuwTCATfKLyRmAmSgAvhGQnZV/l+ 5x01pbMpX0aCMknhF+m8U2KBwqjk6btKenDmYM0yHhcUkjia1ch5svrvZKtozbG0ADhL +LsmjBn2nXgwM/k1fwWFsIBxVl2ZX14806rF0FTrp9nYRdnNvvJAWqSxKKXfs3wM0ebW 2NTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713944410; x=1714549210; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vLgiHI2eQmBCSmXpDk9d23h+nM0x8tNstFRFZLS56zg=; b=SOec7E1oQgA81GW66WxahYxmnfpBBIiTxo9FPhyzL1LWAGsbHkdxq+6BlUvPUMx9go 8na0bqNy+G6fZoJGanF0a8O+Xinij/VrjaRNcnKvbToY6csIlFL4aZhyTXFAdj8skRop ogSqoU5DSWZeHjKYYN7OaAGujWA+kaWsT+I49I7y6SOPJDYA7s/9Irut1EGBCUBJaEPJ AsT1sQ87ldLRBjhBZu9ow5juTQf185UxDyvDgKrVAe1TdWaFGVMxxlHV2l5VSeOjTUOr vgNV3hb7YkPp7qRO1oUAxRiAEwBNsRhNc56klx0VeD9MonFO5lzhNk6ddoD3NblX7Q53 EPCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzO2ySqnDU1yreDdGAik/S/dlsrBS31hfUQacJ8ae51RtUu6pwU w6YElu3RW9Nt8QOgerW3RiYaWj7dJ0+f6pKfCiUFLrdbK4dVfK2rFBOSOq0hYBp+8kVUSUlv/qT eJppHUigHB5OVf+ssPC5A9uhVnlUuMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFRF6Utzwv/nnex8etwkB+2CmUXUZYF0kRT4VtYgUjTKWAoiY/lVoVMvZ/bgLMdCGvgek1U3otljwjiAIV844Y= X-Received: by 2002:a25:acc3:0:b0:dc7:4859:6f1 with SMTP id x3-20020a25acc3000000b00dc7485906f1mr1881551ybd.33.1713944410270; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:40:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3KDMGHI91MHTL.24XCHF6E4X1XG@mforney.org> <20240421234809.GK4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1Z2XU7Z5OB2AV.26EJYFLGNXL0W@mforney.org> In-Reply-To: <1Z2XU7Z5OB2AV.26EJYFLGNXL0W@mforney.org> From: Jon Chesterfield Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:39:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd37380616d2c795" Subject: Re: [musl] Alignment attribute in headers --000000000000bd37380616d2c795 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Re testing GNUC, I'm not sure the macro means "targeting Linux", and it seems totally legitimate that a C compiler which doesn't implement any GNU extensions would not define that macro. Musl is quite a likely choice for a non-gnu compiler that wants to compile code to run against the Linux kernel. > only one of these is sys/fanotify.h, which is > very much a Linuxism feature and it doesn't seem that bad for it to > fail on weird compilers. --000000000000bd37380616d2c795 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re testing GNUC,

I'm not sure the macro means "targeting Linux", and it s= eems totally legitimate that a C compiler which doesn't implement any G= NU extensions would not define that macro. Musl is quite a likely choice fo= r a non-gnu compiler that wants to compile code to run against the Linux ke= rnel.

>=C2=A0only one of these is sys/fanotify= .h, which is
> very much a Linuxism feature and it doesn't seem that bad for it= to
> fail on weird compilers.
--000000000000bd37380616d2c795--