From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8748 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Hockin Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445623385 31319 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 18:03:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:03:05 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8761-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Oct 23 20:03:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpggA-00017s-NY for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:03:02 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29700 invoked by uid 550); 23 Oct 2015 18:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 28658 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2015 18:02:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=M1fvM0A0FDZBPSBticwlskdqcBm1iDRXq7reYM8H728=; b=UCP14GBCbMgmGhpXQMPVSn/FJSWEo/8sOq0XygxprwVko7QqwGq9lUkoVv3HYZXy1b 366/oKTc5qNb1PFhw7F5B+TBkbmVHE8MTru7C1VD3MOzrlEY9txgdvYaa+XfyH0/Beqk dkewy+TqpLTXMftsZqTLV8josFGNBdmB+Fg+EIeLB08kDYF5i/tetNvw3BlouA3CBUss AoiNfSd2+3JSXOS+AY5JXflVCMm1kw492M+TYYk4qHJ0iKrj3lJ4SKEHPOKshlzk52xR GgpQCQ/ShUh2dayKnzkJ9UTKWdD0IpEROZqH3GqmWEt2pMX1gI8hQH+RLCzfA3KZgM9A AyPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=M1fvM0A0FDZBPSBticwlskdqcBm1iDRXq7reYM8H728=; b=L3APGOY+63LXZyDny293gXaut+WP7lhHWCTy5Dt3+Coi1F2bzIen4foApwKnzsWw3j YrgQ4/DhBbXh+YoetF/fBH8lzqedhiT/nLAS2+4Nk7mNCd08gHpXh1KN61NeODiHA0XS pZrMUNj8bb/DPMYPb3izUEDKuajpIBgq50whEcguEqR8SvrAd66oM9RAeyWhkd8dTNIw 1S1py6CvCLmTLLldm5/K1PM8fQuKYllwqF/L/sElav3qEhU24OL0Jbqyh1daWOVLYPXd KZ8GVzbtGc0R5AbH4+3d0zGLFCc9wfQQyTuyywqH1gLT5atnNYsiEh5OP+gO9B5WBunG BsMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnT0p0wX2U2ZuG4PQjTKinya/m2jurWLDG8zoDoc41fePcuV3nTPxN+/DTpr7X2LuTKjVW8 X-Received: by 10.31.140.143 with SMTP id o137mr14351803vkd.56.1445623367286; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8748 Archived-At: I don't know the answer to that - my knowledge of the details of musl are pretty limited and mostly stop at "search doesn't work". On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Jan Broer wrote: >>I think that is where we have arrived (except it's < and >= in your >>expressions). Kubernetes will have to change some to satisfy the >>assumed fungibility of nameservers, but it's the direction things are >>almost certainly moving anyway. > > Hi Tim, i guess i skipped these last message - sorry. > > If you could clear this up for me: > When there are multiple nameservers, does the musl resolver return the first > response it receives regardless of it's status? > So even when it is something like SERVFAIL or REFUSED it will not wait for > the responses from the other nameservers that might be positive? > > Thanks!