From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8745 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Hockin Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:57:56 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20151022215608.GA8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151023081259.GX28311@example.net> <5629FF5F.8060004@skarnet.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445615918 6448 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 15:58:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:58:38 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8758-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Oct 23 17:58:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpeje-0007o3-S2 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:58:30 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32056 invoked by uid 550); 23 Oct 2015 15:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32036 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2015 15:58:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=VhMSYdL5Vo+y5QlaIyGvtXGQZLgsNrsuymhMVPTJoXI=; b=Y1StOUMpKPKSqA+/lSOK6oqd8Es4EtClLcDOXoKrPtokgtWWYCLfcoy47qt8lPUh5r OIeYkaTvQWEhASTOUkGFzxom6Rk3RhpWoAZnmvBBx4T0rQXLYYEzBhtaaCeYHGDah/Hr /JAqvxa2QaTGrM71dNsgEpZvF+77ftddoJoxhRBNBd6gHhQxSMxBr0QUpSI6n829OO/W 5HtSZobH4hnRsL8MHCRkcbiauKJrReVccC7q45otloKhOSePy5cKTZ9OAXCKaR9BnJVT NfRaOaawGLzTDuhCLIupcH3oFlJohxAsT3QKmq5PaSQk50fzv3rvG12CU5dmv5Ekz86K pJXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VhMSYdL5Vo+y5QlaIyGvtXGQZLgsNrsuymhMVPTJoXI=; b=Ygy+uBvhhT5+ik4yEdrKCiWhcisWFxZq2lm+BH/X4IF9vAjW9mSAhmZGf/o22RFSE2 QviiiCjut3+Y/WUw8KqTFwyKn/AWbY6S7ulBDdsXHeb0h2VnQmWrvXheJqkyUqQqJVCl eQNJM2nvotffeyC1E0DUuzU35D2MkyA072ivZqKGf0GxQnBlpGZSjs8b5PpEgeAg4IGx sOFL075Tghyy3P7CcfvCvHYKqbemgKy5tyVEiJ45co189u4sQVNApLSdMzHC7Bc8EeRR qXxCAFqMYO4Jn85DGqx/yMDweNyeXl2UMQwbf8VpW/59kzR2nv96UhtTAxfiAsd9TujA ZreA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlAtwasCyCzmdeCbvfDi2RyFsCzvd9lK9hp/LYORWDzMAFiNOG8VrUwCMiSL0uBOjr4+DTl X-Received: by 10.31.135.12 with SMTP id j12mr10444198vkd.73.1445615896113; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:58:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5629FF5F.8060004@skarnet.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8745 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 23/10/2015 10:12, u-uy74@aetey.se wrote: >> >> +1 to the level 1 comments >> >> +1 to solving the particular problem of a certain deployment >> (the massive reliance on search paths) >> inside the deployment, not in a general purpose library >> >> It looks unrealistic to both have redundancy and differing/conflicting >> data on different servers in a consistent fashion, by the mere mechanisms >> of resolv.conf. >> >> Nice that musl chose consistency and redundancy. >> >> Good if there is an option suitable for systems which need differing >> functionality, but please not at an extra cost for other parties. >> >> A DNS cache looks of course like the right option for fine tuning the >> desired resolution behaviour. > > > +1 to all this. > "search" in /etc/resolv.conf was *never* meant to list resolvers > serving different results. It was always meant to list backups citation needed