From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8746
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:01:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO_RewbOrYNpv8m-Ry=Rcc8FMED98Nz0uQJ2OnizvMBo0b9V-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+MmhbPij34S1dCdsGTS7nAWf6+gpq1MSLuvnth9eBEfCvFX3A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445616151 10336 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 16:02:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-8759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Oct 23 18:02:16 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-8759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-8759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ZpenH-0003XT-2a
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:02:15 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1869 invoked by uid 550); 23 Oct 2015 16:02:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1847 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2015 16:02:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=PvBzmzlRzsWrFjsN4GWQRCjEOdE2m2R7H3fMHN7Behk=;
        b=N57zPTpj3J7X3Qg56/z5OHuAKxb+uCpEBAl8YiZhf81xs0r7y89OjYCiu56woQwTMG
         da3C6zBJAHSNUqCqKY4wF/ydpZ5IEPPlw1ghZyIEfAiXsoyjNz/J39YtDd2fcO63PQb9
         c2YafghoY9J/jsN3AH+zy6TR2zyvBK+P+/gmr/finrO0theFvhuGGl/NRoQ7ZA9lhc7P
         9B9S5zyOMH8Oty+FT+FM/Uf9CUCnq9hFR1RMXEmRJPvsNLt9BLB07JUFTcWfEpJ4mCgx
         zmZMIiHCsyb1gadpmXbMNMn0wNDX0o/yotJnnL34IYjafzQU6JHni5FiK4/8oRtR2xbg
         a51Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=PvBzmzlRzsWrFjsN4GWQRCjEOdE2m2R7H3fMHN7Behk=;
        b=Rm2YF8OYJaRPPU5JCr3Yaypm/70x/BIQ/pLvvONP9XFHeXbZeLs32rYggaxwO8EqmE
         LHHtpFoYY+NuuP1qDBSwSRZAL3enZmOEa9VrhPAqkUoiOIjQjlknCcM/f64vp8NFDE0u
         AXLZWDKxQtSjD9NYc+GWK1PzUO3fnKS03dLIn5jW5eU60tWYzgEnUn17anw+Tcu/Us5Z
         3DvelbOyRzu/qIYXKl7wKAztHhPaT26qRiycZwz5LsfmR5BmJC8ehuExSbtOpXqi3AGg
         pUQIkoPoBPrvCv+4MNdGjEb+L5+sPqbD6enfB1ki1h/mVM6SkQ/RtQuEae1FrBdHSK0d
         ToZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl360QkSY+hT+6e5W+vkxpcReuwUz3dWTd9I0lL1hEQ7iLhQdcGtzh/iWXBYG9VblBFShsa
X-Received: by 10.31.54.13 with SMTP id d13mr13987083vka.155.1445616119648;
 Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+MmhbPij34S1dCdsGTS7nAWf6+gpq1MSLuvnth9eBEfCvFX3A@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8746
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8746>

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jan Broer <jasiu.79@gmail.com> wrote:

> Leave nameserver querying logic as it is: Check!
> Implement search paths: Check!
> Consider ndots option in resolv.conf: Check!
>
> query name <= ndots: search first
> query name > ndots : never search

I think that is where we have arrived (except it's < and >= in your
expressions).  Kubernetes will have to change some to satisfy the
assumed fungibility of nameservers, but it's the direction things are
almost certainly moving anyway.