From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1018 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: printf POSIX compliance Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:37:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120608144423.GN163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120608145519.GP163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120608150618.GB17860@port70.net> <20120608152935.GQ163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120608155322.GR163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4FD22A87.1030709@barfooze.de> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339173508 3485 80.91.229.3 (8 Jun 2012 16:38:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: John Spencer Original-X-From: musl-return-1019-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 08 18:38:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sd2CA-0000nh-9W for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:37:54 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7650 invoked by uid 550); 8 Jun 2012 16:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7640 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2012 16:37:53 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=MVSoGNBzLb7PrNdRKStPeYUrRE544McVVgiUsHmG9qI=; b=dDoMLkF6Vw8uy83ZZDQq6QEt1LKRV83gNSGfOB9V4DP7IST9sWpBKbVkt7Ti1GWxIt WwM8o28xyeYwVr5lqYqVfwq1NskPe00R9BfhfT3kn40Wi1bRAooCJZ594wDlVzp8Oldi KZLTW6p/tggwpugCHAx0mV7TyQd+xf4YC6z77Titb1Lxi6rdruY1G2thw8k3mrvTxYS6 7h4RfSkLawBepNtGS5ADbihakXPKBntwxoYH4W8J7q7rkW9mJhW7sLuz6k41Hg/quEeW nqqPROt1RKEvpGpNVMoEXHWi6TPUQ9RjHUik8TQlZQ2mXDfdFwPoy5heG87+8Jp/rd+m wdXQ== In-Reply-To: <4FD22A87.1030709@barfooze.de> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+Jczrt42e8rEXbrE7xNCILDb7MI4Gros9Ol2b+G4/e0cg8mHRpjs0ONWXpSNmpFME/NKZ Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1018 Archived-At: On 8 June 2012 17:38, John Spencer wrote: > i was recently following a conversation in #gdb where GNU people (!) were > trying to update gnulib and failed... That's odd. I have gnulib as a submodule of my project (GNU Zile), and to update it I cd into the gnulib directory and do "git up" followed by committing the new revision of the submodule. Usually takes me rather less than 5 hours! > i don't think most users of gnulib want to go through this mess... I heartily agree. If it takes 5 hours to update you're doing something wrong. Ask on the gnulib mailing list, there's usually someone happy to help there. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org