From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1414
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: musl 0.9.3 released
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:05:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQ8gd8e0fitfGg2MQmTFUt+RTMT3k+5eybowkDzS5LQwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120803023633.GG544@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <9251.50.0.229.11.1344128449.squirrel@lavabit.com>
 <501DEF70.6060900@barfooze.de> <40178.50.0.229.11.1344142584.squirrel@lavabit.com>
 <20120805052219.GH544@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120806003112.4fd471cd@sibserver.ru>
 <20120806004336.1306937b@sibserver.ru>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344186345 31951 80.91.229.3 (5 Aug 2012 17:05:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1415-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Aug 05 19:05:45 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1415-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1415-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Sy4Gq-0000R1-NG
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:05:40 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 28577 invoked by uid 550); 5 Aug 2012 17:05:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 28569 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2012 17:05:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=3Nolvopdcrad3O4vL1IZ8h1hmkhzUD5HVV/4jIuZdcU=;
        b=b0PiJa4QFjw3aXbbGlzHo7DedqWjLHYZgHibNNuSmSg+BV0Ab08mFhgO19N4+3oAfl
         YC4MupzWrD9cYLSX4QItmTkQcSaDF9N646lAd+swT0E8+KoNl1/yJt/xqasEjmrJQfaT
         FA3kL7Q5BWoPsqX69is/RpmUqazX/4PtPqbTjFHYWQi+in05WRenjCCJi3sQE6zjC8Cf
         +cDU1Xiu3mhKktZ0Gi9/3vz1cHwu2+SODIoMIBUKC6R/FjotyxA1QUiQU1s8My4YE02L
         /u6PousZXaR06TL9hXyXZQx5H848so3PorR2j1I1GmkMlmqjMuLlzaDgrxBHLHQdPNTE
         vsvw==
In-Reply-To: <20120806004336.1306937b@sibserver.ru>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1414
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1414>

2012/8/5 orc <orc@sibserver.ru>:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 00:31:12 +0800
> orc <orc@sibserver.ru> wrote:
>
> Also, does x32 run on plain x86_64?

This is similar to the multilib mode (lib64 + libx32 etc.).

> If it does, then probably that
> large apps like Firefox can be compiled and run in that mode can have
> benefits. If it is required that you must run only x32 kernel, then I
> see no it's benefits currently. It will be much easier to run plain 32
> bits Firefox.