From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3186 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries? Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:55:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1366683267.18069.155@driftwood> <5176FE83.3010301@gentoo.org> <20130424114852.GA99797@intma.in> <20130424133820.GF20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366811753 1940 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2013 13:55:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:55:53 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3190-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 24 15:55:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UV0Av-0004Tk-EV for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:55:57 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21587 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2013 13:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21579 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2013 13:55:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l8Jr3QH+wDBCy3T8I2QMdd+c7e0TX0sR4YqDxYhLuew=; b=tqiCoLc362NDoIR337Ja0ISnGJC5H3uF2BWhDs+xfEdH6FBnNo16ynwICKXmiH6+Qd pHz/fTCeoAKrSpTtNlfzSlV0fe3ea3dr4VRUDf8kQB7j6kXVsIGz1l0md3KLc2CB4ZMU abdIwUE5fIC+Y8XYK3nRlPjKfMpt+3n8kKeAgcL1SWrBsTR0MQ6jr3XgSityA2+gP7oU I1AywsLaUc98HXt+GNpyw5kBPVYPhWT8027/85HWb2jVeBiqpt+J6C+leIRMie+33JL8 CJFkPQnoFFO2zrqFX+EqnW7xHrMkzmDJkV3/YcVUXjIrk/pWCOMwo8koP8/J2P/3VrHY rT5w== X-Received: by 10.152.2.102 with SMTP id 6mr17872847lat.23.1366811745114; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:55:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130424133820.GF20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3186 Archived-At: 2013/4/24 Rich Felker : > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka wrote: >> 2013/4/24 Kurt H Maier : >> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka wrote: >> >> >> >> btw. has anyone used go with musl? >> >> >> > >> > Go ships its own libc, which I'm fairly certain it depends on. >> >> lib9, but are you sure about that? >> >> # ldd /usr/bin/go >> linux-vdso.so.1 =3D> (0x00007fff50fff000) >> libpthread.so.0 =3D> /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007ff215e4b000) >> libc.so.6 =3D> /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff215abf000) >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff216068000) > > Is the go binary written in go? Good question! :) If so, it should be statically linked. http://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse#hg%2Fsrc%2Fcmd%2Fgo > The point was that go links programs > against its own libc, not that the go compiler is linked against its > own libc. I'm not sure if they really use __only__ their own libc (lib9). In my opinion lib9 seems to refer to libc. Daniel > Rich