From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1544
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Priorities for next release?
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:52:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQJvKi18qptLVRV-FqMw93xUOGtWo+1tYFpEPJgWL5KkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120810191254.GA13232@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120811195649.GK27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPLrYETZUKEN_0ej_H7c24V_xdGNqWQNoCRqg4s3BU8oMJ+F5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120811205128.GL27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120811212258.GN27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344775975 8908 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2012 12:52:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1545-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Aug 12 14:52:56 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1545-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1545-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1T0Xf2-0007hm-K8
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:52:52 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21860 invoked by uid 550); 12 Aug 2012 12:52:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 21852 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2012 12:52:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=L5YThKJPQpZXUMpi4znMZarb4RWFZmV5TnyX8K60we8=;
        b=Ym55aAnNNvqMLDVeoVLC6FZ3q5WFOWfrgyaG8fs/WCLFqIO6hiceS1hUK6eJF0bguE
         MSq1FCaHgVTdRADBnFlh32P6dozI6fhKLYq22R0llfKJEM5iKTkYFcIJAgqXoaKRS1gN
         FPOnFh1paAFzTd0mDsrOf2QKJL6kv9V/5hs8IQ9ZK9Cifk1QFECezDHN8ty6tRCSFeZE
         13Qw+bYgeeSml2MYE9Kq3ho12XxuQCPj+F/K/uHplDCFrbvXN6tB8P+7wQcBmC8pYVqK
         0YcFPs7pg3NH9gtQ1M/UbNyNjoSi4qKmhPhYAKboQUVvk0T4yA1IBG6YX/+fZbgzKzjw
         kGAA==
In-Reply-To: <20120811212258.GN27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1544
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1544>

2012/8/11 Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:51:28PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> > I'm sending fgetln.c (+my diff), but please check it...
>> > btw. it based on /usr.bin/make/util.c from OpenBSD:
>>
>> If we add fgetln, I'd like a much higher quality of implementation.
>> It's not clear from the past documentation I've read for this function
>> that it's allowed to use a shared static buffer for all FILEs, and
>> even if it were, I find that really ugly. Instead, simply returning a
>> pointer into the FILE's buffer when the whole line is already present
>> in the buffer, and otherwise allocating a FILE-local buffer for it,
>> would be a lot nicer. fclose could then check the FILE-local pointer
>> and free if it it was allocated.
>
> See attached. Does it work okay?
>
> Rich

Thank you! And I see that is already in the repo... so I built a new
version (with new memcpy).

btw. I see that musl supports getdents(), but it is not visible in dirent.h.

Daniel