From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6921
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Cegie=C5=82ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: thoughts on reallocarray, explicit_bzero?
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:54:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQLE8OF7CtvwRCa_2WguthV87yPRSBbUD1v3NSVkzMutQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140519153130.GA519@muslin> <CAPLrYESpEg_yvyn0odnnr9=0Fg3Ussg7cHH=om1G_yvb8zsQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140519161654.GO507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAPLrYERjMhKWP4pQ6-b7SsNFXcQPaJkRHvspzvtUw3ezuj2ABw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPLrYETk3dT8EnCbqts1u3FYO=iPP7SBop2J_wixk87isR7PPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMSMCxkA-HRdOWzpLkAL=NX5ywF00=HVrNfncOLvu2Nx4p1Scg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422485685 20846 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2015 22:54:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-6934-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jan 28 23:54:41 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-6934-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-6934-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1YGbVQ-0005EP-H8
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:54:40 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 7721 invoked by uid 550); 28 Jan 2015 22:54:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7713 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2015 22:54:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=d9RPlcCOgrIACOVxF2ZBYP3A7rkEFpuzQO2JVDc+87Y=;
        b=v4NriAdPomyfQLIguNg2J1OTFNVVNw6NCUBz9q4xAsn+b/JCWklUU2542MbYVyvtxk
         oqxpgTfW2XbW0rKX7rua29bWINQ4W8JvyDLfDMT4rfrN2S5Z44W4SGItOBMqx6pnlESw
         BNDUB6gNLZM1/TdmtqLNr/BaW+WRohdQUfhcv2rsqfh6T3S/LDxU+81YBDG123dcThqr
         XdxkpOLuP9Lp3ZLsSkGk8W0dlzuWIlD35saTmWWuSajz9+DmZgtLh5iOjFBhHeq+y7qf
         ktBD1/CJ3ym7yb1QPWUCs5atlWoUgAugdtOXRJTNr/em5SDIs+nT11zIZeEVabfW0eDY
         WhBQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.246.163 with SMTP id xx3mr3719437obc.83.1422485666805;
 Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:54:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMSMCxkA-HRdOWzpLkAL=NX5ywF00=HVrNfncOLvu2Nx4p1Scg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6921
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6921>

2015-01-28 23:38 GMT+01:00 Nathan McSween <nwmcsween@gmail.com>:
> How can a compiler optimize out a memory barrier?

The problem is not whether to do it or not, but in the fact that the
right solution is to use memset_s().

http://en.wikichip.org/wiki/c/c11#Bounds-checking_interfaces_annex_.28Annex_K.29