From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3307 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements? Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20130429215500.GJ12689@port70.net> <20130430021014.GC20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130430083516.GK12689@port70.net> <20130508230022.GA14297@Caracal> <20130509140852.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368110437 22068 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 14:40:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:40:37 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3311-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu May 09 16:40:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaS1M-0006lu-Jc for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 16:40:36 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32010 invoked by uid 550); 9 May 2013 14:40:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32002 invoked from network); 9 May 2013 14:40:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=Cx1dPxY+Zk6DGtpWOPORNb1PIZu6aExyAoeNjQ/OUcY=; b=Ga3dFO2zimVmJJKJNGNuUuxhrRtQfHqZVzDX48P+JN8fRXQPoFHwwOw2+zivv5yR0t NfmLxlxoW/AdLzV9gr4LQo0YVj89P8AM68IAjQJzrlKaVOkZufnlKgZZ95j/p6el575R NZYI6F50PrgXeBVc6HuomirfeQq8FakXUPkP92ZoJPxqMl1BsbKE6jEoHLs2FQTbz38F mlmApvBtzTj6guGsxOIuw6/73Zf8jvEts6UyPxiGbxnOq0i3WKCi+/lmG4d5J0d/lwri uNikJOAe7jqa2sQvbYJKLWWKg0vSq8QZP/gdFrF6aZgZhuBtN2MFL6NnXvEA9NVStJML eeRw== X-Received: by 10.112.138.42 with SMTP id qn10mr5446946lbb.70.1368110424470; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130509140852.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3307 Archived-At: 2013/5/9 Rich Felker : >> btw. license issue - can we legally link noxcuse (GPL) with musl (MIT)? :) > > Of course; otherwise musl would be rather useless since there's a huge > corpus of GPL code you want to link and run. The point of a permissive > license is that it does not restrict you from doing things like this. My question was a joke, which was to show how absurd case we have now - instead of software freedom we have concerns. > BTW, I'll probably relicense noxcuse anyway. This is the result of frustration: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ btw. OpenSSL.org published a small version of openssl-fips. It contains only FIPS 140-2 validated code. http://www.openssl.org/source/ http://www.openssl.org/docs/fips/fipsnotes.html OpeSSL-fips vs CyaSSL (musl) # ls -lh /var/tmp/ports/cyassl/image/usr/lib/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 866.9k May 9 09:13 libcyassl.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 659.6k May 9 09:13 libcyassl.so.5.0.0 # ls -lh /usr/local/ssl/fips-2.0/lib/ -r--r--r-- 1 root root 685.7k May 9 12:34 fipscanister.o thx, Daniel