From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4596
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Removing sbrk and brk
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:47:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQSv1kLbJRkAQFGLQFZcvY94LHcu39DfFUsoAYondAvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <loom.20140103T124809-643@post.gmane.org> <20140103173301.GU24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20140103181906.GV24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140103190350.GW24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <loom.20140106T154833-597@post.gmane.org> <20140106224036.GC24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <loom.20140107T104008-769@post.gmane.org> <20140107160627.GD24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20140107220053.GG24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAPLrYEQ-McrP2USf46QzthwLq2oFa9yUURa+tv82PkrQ=jVG=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140221163639.GP23551@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393001257 21825 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2014 16:47:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4600-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Feb 21 17:47:44 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-4600-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4600-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1WGtGE-00015J-EZ
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:47:38 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 26336 invoked by uid 550); 21 Feb 2014 16:47:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 26326 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 16:47:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=qif937RRhKneEIMTq01Uf/owdreoglgyYptSQQRDZ0E=;
        b=vN0mFmYWP1O5gbSkT7cj4vhfg8gqUz9woeXD660UtMSWUVDbglzBRNWH4TWgAR5ug2
         UneoofrcwD4SCJ/kvLqo7XJ50ekT0tD2hDPrCtc01gOFGwEiEAXmnDfEwyzRMjEsX1s0
         SH5/AvtKvq8Gyt5M2xbewE4y90qFkhMOAJd1txKRxA5hynkUdv2G+V2XsVBeiJ5h+6M3
         UKQZHSrLtDTXA5K9Xx/1PTsAOh2/axspxrwWYAA8MAbEEJ9Ps2Sug9+fXgkN1SF5W0vZ
         AFOonKODKDvFs2B47m3gjGCcsNWlQ6OITyd1XbW08N8YgxDgqyhqRpeHZZktCq2ARGGk
         RkcQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.151.82 with SMTP id b18mr11425670qaw.102.1393001245416;
 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:47:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140221163639.GP23551@port70.net>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4596
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4596>

2014-02-21 17:36 GMT+01:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>:
> * Daniel Cegie?ka <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com> [2014-02-21 17:03:36 +0100]:
>> And what do we do with failures when sbrk is used?
>>
>
> most of these only call sbrk(0) which is supported

ok, thank you for the information.


>> http://ex-vi.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ex-vi/ex-vi/ex_subr.c?revision=1.8&view=markup
>>
>
> the "old musl" did not support sbrk either (the cited code uses it
> with malloc), the "new musl" just helps you find the bug more easily

ex/vi doesn't work with the new musl. Too bad, because it is the
traditional unix ex/vi. Maybe Gunnar Ritter still fixes bugs.

best regards,
Daniel