From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4078 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: GLOB_BRACE Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:24:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <524051AD.8070008@gentoo.org> <20130923150323.GH20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <5243AB8E.1070706@gentoo.org> <20130926182309.GS20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130926183812.GT20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130926185938.GU20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130926191330.GV20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380223495 14433 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2013 19:24:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:24:55 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4082-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 26 21:25:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VPHBK-0004sq-VZ for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:24:59 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24028 invoked by uid 550); 26 Sep 2013 19:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24020 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 19:24:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ieiFlfFVf7PpRC8wHXJVJ0qufh1x9zCIgQbz06kg8/M=; b=XixZ9PnQLtMmjRniZNr/gKfmZ8EAU8sVeSEzv/Cdnr/jJuN7jXbSiyk6MKzkFSAHxi vrp/VnDRHxo1I8rg2m7YXie0O66Q2PGYqhC/GMYAE/l5mC3/GSKkHXiyoxflpPUX9Eb/ znyPb+MRyZO6h+yXB5VKeBLviwtnHVAXtvlJiCCl0+J/avH90ReMxjOjR5glVEh9r5uG nsPFPOAatVZuc06c+OfY0+EMuoVNq/KnBwjVDR9xnUGn20WcJIeVzLTTYxD2Qqny6xTh 7XJ+Jd6eUSWVQoxBDjVc/E83Umljtov11z67+ft/ET0yf7jK9TYDXNZ2fjRXEQisdSNc eepA== X-Received: by 10.152.88.20 with SMTP id bc20mr1889689lab.37.1380223485595; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:24:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130926191330.GV20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4078 Archived-At: 2013/9/26 Rich Felker : > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:10:21PM +0200, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka wrote: >> @Rich >> Thank you, I will try to fix it. It was first time I started to write >> init and I had no experience what is necessary. I just studied runit, >> minit, ninit and others *init. Thank you again for your feedback. > > Not all of it was "fixes"; some was just comments. In particular I > don't know what the SIGWINCH stuff is for, nor whether there's any > good reason they're doing the console manipulation stuff. However, I > suspect even if that stuff is potentially useful, it would be better > (from the sense of flexibility) done from the rc script rather than > the init process. In Nicholas Kain's ninit there are similar things - in other implementations also seen such stuff. http://kain.us/nk/projects/ > > Rich