From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4449
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Removing sbrk and brk
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:59:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQonRWEFZM6fPFLJqOQfKm2NEZ5hxF4QhQyuS9_xEHMgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20131221234041.GA13204@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20131222184855.GS1685@port70.net>
 <20131223044609.GZ24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140102220302.GR24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <loom.20140103T124809-643@post.gmane.org>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388753990 11699 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 12:59:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:59:50 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4453-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jan 03 13:59:58 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-4453-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4453-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Vz4Lv-000553-DP
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:59:51 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 11344 invoked by uid 550); 3 Jan 2014 12:59:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11336 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2014 12:59:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=MO4s6lngakRilpn8/aemOii7BjJaEq3jWyhhcO6I+IA=;
        b=MG9ZuvW6hffBX9xMZZ9+JHt+xYGNBCuagJaQkILM/7pLMmGG9tEiA16lJ4drwtwhZ+
         MiSLUyxfYHHauLWmUfJgLfkaqTbFkqZ7K4ll2lWb1TWL92eP4jPnUK7i6Y9ClyIQGLMT
         PwqCz787VbEI1dE0o1eBKwtHkffBSu9FgmYmyd1KpZvTTFiBmTfrngNvQW/+BkgNJYnt
         Tvwawtbujj4UPwExl7Kv5DHX0GKFDr5ca57Qo+SpBTiainSLOXY8G6WVvEkVI0jl2D9b
         XyIF6SosEfNjWSoe8q82A5PyxjASZ8XlKaWTzDb145dl9bBURDzKWqVSYymYJBk567w4
         GQ0Q==
X-Received: by 10.224.56.5 with SMTP id w5mr146088664qag.60.1388753978536;
 Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:59:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140103T124809-643@post.gmane.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4449
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4449>

2014/1/3 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>:
> Rich Felker <dalias <at> aerifal.cx> writes:
>
>> sbrk may be re-added sometime after 1.0 if malloc is changed to no
>> longer use the brk (option 5 above).
>
> You may want to import omalloc (based on mmap malloc, written from
> scratch by Otto Moerbeek) with lots of security features:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=malloc
>
> It does assume that mmap() is randomised and NULs the result.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos

Yes, I also wanted to suggest malloc from OpenBSD. This may be the
right solution for musl.

Daniel