From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7847
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Cegie=C5=82ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow different paths for static and shared libraries
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:54:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERCU9b+ZczOESMH8hLQ66FCU2J3XA9xMxF3Skr8cc9qeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1433057065-9167-1-git-send-email-ismael@iodev.co.uk>
 <20150531073157.GR17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150531061054.75f86040@pirotess>
 <20150531163034.GT17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150531185142.7cf46c31@pirotess>
 <20150601012725.GU17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433184892 6396 80.91.229.3 (1 Jun 2015 18:54:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-7860-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Jun 01 20:54:51 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-7860-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-7860-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1YzUrK-0005qg-Ke
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:54:50 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 17722 invoked by uid 550); 1 Jun 2015 18:54:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 17700 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2015 18:54:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=HOTEODPb1WPpH3NIS7b/wnw/tdsTrCksRWpALvN8nG8=;
        b=fyA82VLUuP8V6a1XYClTZYy/nlDHYx8nBBqUGQrfPJHon/AU9UJ/Dz2FEwfEMpNMZ3
         lgq0VUiz88BlYpsctGg3cbon2TzKBryBoz9yFq8cwrseOWaIYVilpxMunsdhpJfIYBdO
         wOJ0vS2H1hAjfqAadv1zUoQKF1tx5ysCjwyBaW4G03JcgP8P6L90HPfUz7UpQe1H+bRi
         M4JMDSkXn5gctWQMKYd+geS5dpiiK5HA4ACLUOldVzDsYiEW8AgW+HHuu6weWSf5TcvG
         WkEkY9e2Hst78qbvNhDlIoQClzVHj6zBBAZAcUTQtY23TaoZm8Pl52KEvH/d8WgZNayv
         KtDw==
X-Received: by 10.55.41.195 with SMTP id p64mr40891062qkp.40.1433184876316;
 Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150601012725.GU17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7847
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7847>

2015-06-01 3:27 GMT+02:00 Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 06:51:42PM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 May 2015 12:30:34 -0400
>> Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:

>> A ld script in place of libc.so, containing "GROUP ( /lib/libc.so )",
>> would workaround that.
>
> Are you sure? I think that would result in a dependency for
> "/lib/libc.so" getting put in the binary rather than one for
> "libc.so", and that's also a serious bug.

from gentoo:

# cat /usr/lib/libc.so
/* GNU ld script
   Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
   the static library, so try that secondarily.  */
OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf64-x86-64)
GROUP ( /lib64/libc.so.6 /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a  AS_NEEDED (
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ) )

btw. I am not a fan of this solution.

Daniel


> Rich