From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3302
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 09:36:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERWt3wjXtB92NUA6skQ2Q8jneMYzHEp3U_N_TUoBS8a1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOPXC2mtay5vyPUdLbbC3Pp+HQG3WxAH3mtRDZeby2+jfxzVrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130429101620.GG12689@port70.net> <CAOPXC2kYu7WxcRAqT-Ni=hYwJkxreSEvMRh7vsVap=e4VjcVjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130429215500.GJ12689@port70.net> <20130430021014.GC20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAOPXC2n3Q0Q5LKA9SG-Fz6gzj+_0HLjAetvXq-Sf80B5xh05eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130430083516.GK12689@port70.net> <CAOPXC2mdk397cWFkqAz4bJNo4_+fWBv-VupWCHJTLGuFawcFDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOPXC2kZgOiCDiczx5e61ewQAV9PYXvCBrpuHUFs_S11DR08Bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPLrYESUcvCM+H+b9VrmF6A+LyQHZdU349JfpSNv=GAb22vT8A@mail.gmail.com> <20130508230022.GA14297@Caracal>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368085016 7980 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 07:36:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 07:36:56 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3306-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu May 09 09:36:55 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3306-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3306-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UaLPJ-0007WR-Um
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:36:54 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 28467 invoked by uid 550); 9 May 2013 07:36:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 28459 invoked from network); 9 May 2013 07:36:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=uQfQ8ytM9IgnrjeuDqXMcuE0WiLx79+u/JMnNUreBAc=;
        b=N7TEZDFsjpUOTBivgFxJ1nxYMJgy78VCzkLAz3ZAkIj9MGXvzvBHrt/6eG//wB+9O+
         QCJ2NOovdQdRQMhEJYiTb9BSY2V6dWeglHlwboPmlqxS+0sIEpR4r3weF5yvnvCZgAal
         S607fx3aa8Eomh3HJ7o0Ai2H12Q4cQeuAPDIUtj+CNon3jtfc15qS94S6mqn4JNtufAg
         xDeUemp0+6z9TI6haCswsBHQE3bNndWZEZLoYb7zFGSrUgiGGu4VYwOHwDI7y14VE0pb
         N3d7TUHTHBFyo/XWWdjoiDVWh7R6/8CyefstNiuylINNR9cFKvjLtA11UISM8EriOWaU
         rdug==
X-Received: by 10.224.49.72 with SMTP id u8mr7602956qaf.21.1368084998078; Thu,
 09 May 2013 00:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130508230022.GA14297@Caracal>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3302
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3302>

2013/5/9  <idunham@lavabit.com>:

> Tropicssl is a fork of polarssl, but as far as I can tell they haven't
> fixed CVEs 2013-0169, 2013-1621, and 2013-1622 yet.
>
> While I agree with their view of the license switch, the activity (or
> lack thereof) does not seem promising.

The problem is that we have the choice to either accept the GPL
(CyaSSL, PolarSSL) or write own implementation of a ssl from
scratch... or use eg tropicssl as a ssl base.

btw.  license issue - can we legally link noxcuse (GPL) with musl (MIT)? :)

Daniel