From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3371
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:27:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERfA-z40US==BB+v-2nAWoPsb6fkjtZ5-GnD+03YTx8ug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130425041553.GA13951@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAOPXC2=iHvRetaLzvdOuRKdXe5D19_-G+2N5vf-dxxYy7M6eQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPLrYER960BeuYE31f=ES=m25O6PPpDUrXzRCTAhhaTROQbakQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOPXC2nthi=Lr9fPsVpc3sN3e-EupytUYJPB3neOzfvHz_dC0g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369733278 16927 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2013 09:27:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:27:58 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3375-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue May 28 11:27:58 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3375-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3375-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UhGCE-0000Ie-6o
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:27:58 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 13374 invoked by uid 550); 28 May 2013 09:27:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 13366 invoked from network); 28 May 2013 09:27:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Ff/IyFLDuZipMkkiYQtPS3AT87LvkRqjS/cfi/iSYbY=;
        b=E7armSJUIj5SZddCVtS8eBjmsRDu9bcj1zyAN/6FUPd4EsDnuml6Ok/x+2Kd46ui/o
         diHrkf27h73vuKXE4l6uvjkE03MPih7kBuob4mC+3Fsdixo/h2BVGQWx1a/chM6sHZsI
         PBf4ppqQD4wkNJ/m65Nri18gl2pejTdGRhaYHxVd1O2XJZEDODwCBx8LaMJgfXWGdVVK
         TIr8gH7pvPimDaMMDtHQPDs1HPvjP7K5gvl7i1HNSJiYajhqwzOgO9vP0BDrg3QPDglv
         kkqDLe2VoL7EbJ1m/8Pj9kYnOAzLvjTqo5wRt4qbU3erQT6GqM8P5lsicObrI1GyuMPm
         pbEw==
X-Received: by 10.112.154.35 with SMTP id vl3mr13200868lbb.55.1369733264919;
 Tue, 28 May 2013 02:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOPXC2nthi=Lr9fPsVpc3sN3e-EupytUYJPB3neOzfvHz_dC0g@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3371
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3371>

2013/5/27 Gregor Pintar <grpintar@gmail.com>:

> Unless someone really takes a deep look (vulnerabilities, TLS 1.2)
> into tropicssl,

I think that in a few weeks, I will have free time to do so. That's
why I care about the opinion, if you are interested to use tropicssl's
BSD code as ssl layer for kripto.

Daniel