From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1557
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Design for extensible passwd[/shadow?] db support
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:45:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERwFGbTor2om6aW94j5uC6XY+wuOWTbbB1=aU-ho-mcvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20538.50.0.229.11.1344817584.squirrel@lavabit.com> <20120813003110.GU27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344854791 31252 80.91.229.3 (13 Aug 2012 10:46:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1558-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Aug 13 12:46:31 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1558-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1558-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1T0sAC-0008F6-7W
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:46:24 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 19747 invoked by uid 550); 13 Aug 2012 10:46:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 19739 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2012 10:46:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=TYuT+2b5zZ6b9oTYar2dy+f6wr03xbRP3sovQA544oI=;
        b=U6yEDQsdt2zFywRpW+jqwu4RRfu8SsXrAyGPiq1ZQGG+1/81olLF2O+iFVa/1gP5l+
         KE2ZV0hNWRHb4VjfPRBZ90dRNVjq/wE87CvBTfroRVN2ESKKgiSpSnyqEpiNTb3/0p6e
         jGhgWI5EgsCO9tVTx2bH35vSI5Z4+JHcgljz16bMTaxotI6++Prg3dvwvfMw0pqSIuDT
         YxVz8oji8foua3cYLycuwKSnhfWlu5TkRAdzqMSDXSU3uZmvWmPFs/6WyMKKolKq3Wj1
         RYtX9vSG0HgnLtuvbvqhKpeW64Ux6BuQO4pUnbDVS6DkoyVXKaT+jTc/sFvnb2cXsR4m
         Bqow==
In-Reply-To: <20120813003110.GU27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1557
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1557>

2012/8/13 Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:26:24PM -0400, idunham@lavabit.com wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, is PAM excluded from consideration? Does it require a
>> dynamically-loaded library?
>
> PAM is not an implementation of the user database. It's for
> authenticating logins. Completely different problem domain.


A bit off topic: Is the traditional PAM/shadow will be supported in
musl? I would like to use full PAM/shadow/tcb stack from the Owl
with musl (+owl's pam modules). If not, what would be an alternative proposal?

best regards,
Daniel

>
> Rich