From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2517
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: STLport
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:57:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYES2Kz4Wz42eb_wAiENwqxTVEPLaBArnY6XMfh3a6FoamA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1716568.15394.1356922853329.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au> <50E1319C.1060301@gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356940719 20560 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2012 07:58:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2518-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Dec 31 08:58:55 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-2518-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2518-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TpaGo-0000eB-1z
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:58:50 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 28500 invoked by uid 550); 31 Dec 2012 07:58:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 28487 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2012 07:58:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=cHkljJ3U/+7kFg4OKUcXXv8r2+IH6kqRmfR3W9bJz/M=;
        b=CANcy/oFMfy7FbZJvXTlk13PCM05Xtxu7Z9pGpZYv3fhXNc2s/WdwXaNuyooEUz2dt
         1SyEZuBepZYfYRDgl916pECxIeFnBxp9NnLEUaPGEPZURPtV2Kl6+10RMj04yHvAbmMe
         njOwQb/eHw3o4b/4IECTUAoBAk4C2Ap9jIFPi5DEkNHgXUAlb57oD7qYfHakBtKhGaY/
         AI5O4ZcQYGrIBbuLlALLqKKXDkgrLSQIUNC00TsSUAZUksj2/Sgpbv6+thL8L29KAOA3
         6oAzE95exaWstBZy4vRVI7rZ1jhOfKiZtaCMqjkndxeA6UHQHezCijH07W/IzQasI5JA
         2YRQ==
In-Reply-To: <50E1319C.1060301@gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2517
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2517>

perhaps gcc-5 will be more modular (like LLVM stuff):

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA3MzE

Daniel