From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4259
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Feature request: stdatomic.h and threads.h
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:19:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYES65HS=khwmO2K6wB=SvbY8sZC-XzvG19x0XFaWMy1ohA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPLrYERvnZVEJsjm0u++_kWyqTjvSKORV-M3LXx6yxaq2xwq6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131121164205.GQ24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385054391 25308 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2013 17:19:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:19:51 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4263-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Nov 21 18:19:56 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-4263-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4263-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1VjXv1-0008SK-Hw
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:19:55 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 17999 invoked by uid 550); 21 Nov 2013 17:19:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 17991 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2013 17:19:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=BJTa6deNOYAQM7aeRl4DCNirjWxkXm2wvMvf7dvlnw8=;
        b=YF5KGslTdHfgKHfdre6lUJbpkLzIwCrOG96W3RArxUEt9Z6gtHh1p2u6ALdDF/L2ga
         vpPBzJiRXzqV14aVYKhMm6mRe58/Na9rUdYMHZluAaIUSCxVUlYKgCC98xtOU7GHySPZ
         C13cSdAwq3A/IuWm4lG05CXeov49Tok0KuQW72dhd7IfEodX2YKpWqMsLXpn0zy0j30E
         zR66AwWO5imyzjOt6hKeSmPLF3fgceqhmajDm6IA2nFbEjPAFRhWjaR3nf3Fk0B6OPF+
         a9i52zI16YMLjHrecg0POjt5lepRg+52ybmwgQ60Bzpu9wZ7+m0TUmbbw4FbnPOhjZ1Z
         vlWw==
X-Received: by 10.112.13.202 with SMTP id j10mr5353685lbc.29.1385054382959;
 Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:19:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131121164205.GQ24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4259
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4259>

2013/11/21 Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:31:35AM +0100, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2013/06/29/17
>>
>> Is there a plan to add support for stdatomic.h and threads.h?
>
> Yes, but not before 1.0. stdatomic.h is probably not hard if you
> assume GCC __sync_* builtins (or it could be written in an
> arch-specific way),

like for stdalign.h

http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/stdalign.h

I use a few tricks to support atomic operations (with __sync_*), but
C(11) has a huge backlog vs c++.

> but threads.h is much more complicated and
> involves ABI decisions where I'm partly waiting to see what glibc
> does.
>
> Rich

thx,
Daniel