From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1047
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Vision for new platform
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:53:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYES8hf2V8eh1rO1DT+_-w-s3H831p11o-x4HFs3hZ-+krg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120518010620.GW163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120609192756.6e72f25e@sibserver.ru>
 <20120609074426.496a5e13@newbook> <20120609212411.GA163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <87lijwnmao.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339332866 26394 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2012 12:54:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1048-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Jun 10 14:54:26 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1048-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1048-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Sdhew-0003QQ-KX
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:54:22 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 16128 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jun 2012 12:54:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 16119 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2012 12:54:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=+y5uczAxo0V1ahZNZB9JdH9KNebm5SnH+ugu41XAqYI=;
        b=cv7DYzcOYMix4sT3MT0Xu+jO9PewoobWIqiVAwXoaIbn/cK7aVMQXmvGzJtYfAaX0H
         EqKG0PLwWAvQfuytkDvelZGZPxNruHN5gwR+ivHxZ5gRLiP4WPvCENDLTQScqr1XelBI
         sp84688xihJEbxaVNzdSUwpiEtj8Twoz24e0JUXRpFPiPvQC7/qQpUho5TnCDH7HtjrV
         E9rdNPcrZXDlh4Peob1zZ8fh2xUzDmBV8EaZKtAY3lrSO4y+Y45ZGRI3rNMZ1FxVpDx/
         4RhApDWHhYgbfE0QLaUpogEaFDZPQTVTMR9XRiIXWdbNnrPxM8AwATTLnc3SiVrt2XoV
         7rnA==
In-Reply-To: <87lijwnmao.fsf@gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1047
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1047>

2012/6/10 Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com>:
> Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> writes:
>
>> A much better approach for systems that need automatic
>> stopping and starting of daemons would be to have a tiny
>> daemon-supervisor process to handle it; small systems with a very
>> "hands-on" admin not wanting to automate this could then skip the
>> supervisor daemon and start/stop manually.
>
> This is exactly what daemontools and variants do, with minimal code:
> http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
> http://offog.org/code/freedt.html


Chapter 4.1.1 Introducing procer:
http://mongrel2.org/static/book-finalch5.html

code:
https://github.com/zedshaw/mongrel2/tree/master/examples/procer

I think that using the code from the available solutions (like
daemontools, procer etc.) and based on our thoughts, we can prepare a
solution that would meet our expectations... secure and simple.

regards,
Daniel