From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1884
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: documenting musl
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:42:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYESVTdFkowmQz6WS9ybobpVBSSqu_VsaDCB0u4_nHzD8cA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120908024006.GA5937@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120907233658.2eb8ee1a@newbook>
 <CAPLrYERh6-8__Ujjkj1R4RTq72OnKqczOHG44ADew6f+ACBLxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120908114828.GA67571@intma.in> <CAPLrYETBXXOb7VpucBApU=ih0wK=x5DUR6RMAc0=fGQQrOLfbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120908124723.GA68331@intma.in> <CAPLrYEThSp-kJr-o=tXSf-pRXK3RAHbTy+j5dJuxcbTScBJF1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120908131613.GA68892@intma.in>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347111816 22103 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2012 13:43:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:43:36 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1885-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 08 15:43:38 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1885-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1885-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TALJw-0006EW-Gu
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:43:36 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 3903 invoked by uid 550); 8 Sep 2012 13:43:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 3895 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2012 13:43:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Bm/359obguybGpv4wgbjNshljPV/pPB+r7GciPFVlug=;
        b=x7O5VP0DfAZk2b2HHffnhvnU3o87aSbBuwsepVwM+W7QhqAauNzBFvY/U0G+RrejZX
         UxXXsdEiVl8jJVoGRfsugCQ0zsBfmoOzTN3PQEP00L9RrfItOAtZa/fKWF0qLVuYSfj7
         LvKiSatU4+wdbYkSxgVJ1thQD16eTjYGWUgywEoIus/3/i7begseuOinbb5QO3v0PTk8
         rn7mdFH/yLqPvW/bbDaMgZ3CrsWxw3WORMujIB8dPrZyzjQKSN3jYotSigkQZwFSoBwl
         +nDK6PuRRI8v3/nSdXRpmN87DP5lON2UcnS8Hh+1Ce83qo6a6fbFNFFrlmhrj0UTb3UM
         ogXw==
In-Reply-To: <20120908131613.GA68892@intma.in>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1884
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1884>

2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>:
>> lib9? I don't know how lib9 is compatible with the musl...
>
> Ok.  If you promise to stop pasting random terminal shit, I promise to
> remember you don't care about anything at all except mandoc.

ok.
correct me, but it lib9 is a libc implementation on Plan9 OS. I
understand that you (suckless.org) port it into Linux. Maybe it's
better to use musl instead lib9? I presented my opinion and I
understand that you have a different opinion, but please, why do you
think it would be a better solution than mandoc etc.? mandoc, like
musl, is a new and fresh solution with supports modern expectations
for the documentation system. Why old troff will be better?

best regards,
Daniel