From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1878 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: documenting musl Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:35:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20120908024006.GA5937@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120907233658.2eb8ee1a@newbook> <20120908114828.GA67571@intma.in> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347107759 25690 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2012 12:35:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:35:59 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1879-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 08 14:36:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TAKGT-0002rT-J8 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 14:35:57 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3514 invoked by uid 550); 8 Sep 2012 12:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3505 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2012 12:35:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F9B8NPnyNSltYWvxEVlqoJEf8nBu0p43JSsadq4qrHY=; b=U1PjI+gwpBadciGvUivjoEx0TOTRUfCqb7wIoq+3+ovJ5/qPqTx4ioHidVwJYKIgc4 ltcpmLymaKE8Q8A64J+xe0FCSqjvnhrZ87jxSGT8cN9mU6teZHfrsxxK9DE/IlCdj7J1 gTV/YQSkPdARF6c5dCUMwVxFVvgyois3tbApniW4L776IYCmLursH2FzME0q4Yx8lgNm 42rbK4/KCM2rEl3YFGahBvnpGEcGvUnH0t8T62++mircqwcjKTrqozAkXiVVKr7zV/C9 SgYnEQe4IyVDSbWiVUp1gonFzErJOSSUpbbT9ddFJFCZ49XaYCHWxYC5kY3iuiukmH2T 5OyQ== In-Reply-To: <20120908114828.GA67571@intma.in> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1878 Archived-At: 2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier : > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka wrote: >> btw. documentation - mandoc is a better option than (old/big/ugly) >> groff for documentation. > > None of those links explain why they seem to think it's either groff or > roll-your-own, when there are plenty of lightweight roff > implementations. Any hints? hmm... mandoc isn't lightweight? :) # du -h | grep image/ 20.0K ./image/usr/share/man/man1 8.0K ./image/usr/share/man/man8 32.0K ./image/usr/share/man 36.0K ./image/usr/share 248.0K ./image/usr/bin 288.0K ./image/usr # ls -lh image/usr/bin/ total 244 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 apropos -> mandoc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 makewhatis -> mandoc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 243.9K Sep 8 12:24 mandoc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 mandocdb -> mandoc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 whatis -> mandoc compared to groff (gentoo): (cut...) 7.1M ./image/usr/share 4.0K ./image/usr/lib64/groff/site-tmac 60K ./image/usr/lib64/groff/groffer 68K ./image/usr/lib64/groff 72K ./image/usr/lib64 3.4M ./image/usr/bin 11M ./image/usr 11M ./image Daniel