From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1589
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Todo for release?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:55:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYETGvq9L-AEcTj9wOqrMtuJ+890WMnucwF_CVuZvNdcQfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120813185329.GA20024@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120815040836.GJ27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1345020942 18509 80.91.229.3 (15 Aug 2012 08:55:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:42 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1590-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 15 10:55:42 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1590-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1590-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1T1ZO8-0004uJ-RE
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:55:40 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 9347 invoked by uid 550); 15 Aug 2012 08:55:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 9339 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2012 08:55:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=E0iX2ijkZDBf3qxffxb1HFPvKMSYv/EFFVGymPO0F+E=;
        b=iVLElytgrtoJYhFJqE1imsKH7fsiRwCiZUrwChgNONmwu+R8Ba9ZsLl3HWE462U4/e
         uy/UvuBHF/SyKkQEeqsQwyGtrlAuj1MATC+okedjI7gpV3cUIoyfj69AUgLLMTebMBuN
         P6Y6xFWQ6rQzqYPFM0qkQY6qGF+IF9SsMIJ22/6zODnYmUrsljGuc+BrreaVxmogPVdx
         qyGIx8P4hxI+O6dJsBdi7wFMNsxKNaOZbKPjJNrsEMrui2Bs33L/rKHIk1kPem5CKrLz
         olx3MaP9aHn6R+UlMFBO0jOWIeKGDjNQ0W2r1+F0coM6JpnYdD4fpoP7V/uhBjsqc1HH
         5Rzg==
In-Reply-To: <20120815040836.GJ27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1589
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1589>

>
>> - Support for __progname (Daniel)
>
> Daniel, any more thoughts on this? Are there lots of programs that
> want it that can't easily be patched to simply use argv[0] themselves?

This is not something that is absolutely necessary. __progname quite
often is used on *BSD and less on Linux (eg. Owl's msulogin,
popa3d)... but __progname is always easy to fix.

Here we have the OpenBSD repo and content /bin directories:

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/bin/

And here's a list of programs (from /bin/) that require __progname (70% of all):

mv
systrace
md5
cp
chmod
cat
rmail
kill
sleep
rmdir
mkdir
extern
ps
df
rcp
ln
date
chio
domainname
stty
rm
pwd
hostname

For __progname  we probably need to modify (asm) files in the musl/crt/.

Best regards,
Daniel