From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6903
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Cegie=C5=82ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: getrandom syscall
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:25:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPLrYETWUhn6nj9MXf0URcK+cWkVX17hQvM8RKYpnLCAj9ghFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPLrYERojt8q5JDKG5UZJxoouKvN+OgAZz6ixhuFB85EPZzF6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150128145410.GH4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150128154108.GH32318@port70.net>
 <CAPLrYEQEfZyaAbcC3NbTdzc-TdJ-B-hz1iqBYb5f=sMAvxdJig@mail.gmail.com> <20150128160352.GI32318@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422462359 5423 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2015 16:25:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-6916-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jan 28 17:25:59 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-6916-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-6916-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1YGVRF-0007B3-CO
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:25:57 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 22408 invoked by uid 550); 28 Jan 2015 16:25:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 22393 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2015 16:25:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ZHRMhIRMmYM9QiL1wfBsvpitAVR6TAhnu04nFG6QJ6E=;
        b=nKo8vPQXNaj99rt6q+2MaDs8vIL4qe4neq7tkKmqGHU8ojxV2s7IvZzQXQ6mWn5Ozo
         +JSUEvIzZ3h+t6Lw7x9B3IBUwuGOo+//hHMQDn9/w6j+V59fy8+nwMYxvjrLB/ORuzi1
         yKFPMussdte/nZKNxAP9SY5WxcAGbCfca2y8u0GIrY1BJHd9MKt5iLdtan90sv3G394R
         lJvyBJocXNXWtD3KWmBIIbdA7FTk9SNMOB/PBCs2LOJcSRaCKEPW/FXDXG84Lz1Kczh0
         xW9jgUwwE9lJ6im++T3qRNlXdgg5Ikr6hfxbNku5nb76btNbawqxRlv2WCASFDONXn+o
         5dqQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.120.230 with SMTP id lf6mr2653517obb.39.1422462343537;
 Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:25:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150128160352.GI32318@port70.net>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6903
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6903>

2015-01-28 17:03 GMT+01:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>:

>
> i dont see any function prototype discussed there
>
> exposing this syscall without the flags makes no sense to me

Yes, that was my mistake. I had read about long time block above 256
bytes, and by mistake I did not pay attention to what actually I sent.
syscall is now clean and safe version is getentropy. Sorry for that.