From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1362
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: empty lib*.a files
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:33:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYETX4=58YrVB226ht44pGE4PpTkLAaDPKoAC52jpqASOXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPLrYEQ4YgpkCpzuS7wYt8z4tdak2gV+bwrbKKkV02wxeV-0Tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <500F0257.7010709@purdue.edu>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343162032 16839 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2012 20:33:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1363-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jul 24 22:33:52 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1363-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1363-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Stlnj-0007oQ-E7
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:33:51 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15711 invoked by uid 550); 24 Jul 2012 20:33:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15700 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2012 20:33:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=JounbsPb0a2uMY/PdxxN/Lnfj+UkTLGiiiPPY4SEDVA=;
        b=Kg3uq0kRBMUWV3X8NaAiUHlIWgVNucc/wsY6/vXLksTB0sYZOaSlI0vyYaBxXuMFya
         kVQVzF0WjV54SgdWLJCq+dJdelpS7+ZJUIFqqDDYJ3rL6NJs8F4msZ4tDQPj5FPf8lNq
         zfDZNd2EG8QxP52mLmt+AqZiLQpjSNdkE9MYDhVTsRr3Zuv2BuVaoW6f/HOSOu7Lquhr
         fLyJuMQC+D37mpTLDbbqt8wJb9ocwAPBJxzkmMw2c6aUAbnDkv/WHn6PVtFYyp8AaPzI
         UFKKwHy5yOhl18mwIYCHcywUHL2HqhdiSKctglguTT9FeEmyR5/Mfd2g2prvkS6coiyG
         /Ezw==
In-Reply-To: <500F0257.7010709@purdue.edu>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1362
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1362>

> musl puts everything in libc. The other libs are only present for
> compatibility with build scripts that are incapable of proper detection.
> They are, as it is said, intentionally left blank.
>
> With valediction,
>  - Gregor Richards
>

thx, we had a lot of problems with crypt_blowfish in libc vs libcrypt :)

http://openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/07/21/1

daniel