From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4070
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Cegie=B3ka?= <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: GLOB_BRACE
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:30:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLrYETu4-tUnRW4rhKVst5Mhbz4sjiCkA-7iRhqgQVR9P3H1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKHv7pi7ZGHZJ_J-+M8mNd-QBJKKRNw3_zB_0SnP5brWj7HfPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130916125049.GG20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAKHv7pgNExd=8fY+_OZP+98+Vn59uo5DODT5i1U5-xVicOKfSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1379945328.1974.50@driftwood> <524051AD.8070008@gentoo.org>
 <20130923150323.GH20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAKHv7pjewwgz-Xx8MzKgnX5TaSqXBy9JLwm63DUBgy23n--ndg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5243AB8E.1070706@gentoo.org> <20130926182309.GS20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380220253 4858 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2013 18:30:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4074-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 26 20:30:54 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-4074-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4074-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1VPGKy-0007KG-2f
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:30:52 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 550); 26 Sep 2013 18:30:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 28022 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 18:30:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=tmGgISsKWXXOAMXPCjPY+QbDRj/Qc72fPBVE6frhyJM=;
        b=XnLGhiv/0IQDMTWgAuUVA+jvEf9R9e9zUUw3zaBjQx3O3gSuW+/svvQe6uE/MrRZd/
         15HU6h7wnHtShWGrsWmCMwmvaS+8dTuNd8Xjam5rlPMhhZ1Bf4hIzW0iPVKCdKGIjVTi
         2jmj+JDSwuivoo0sPL5xIZU4V4LJ/rNRAfRsidQMaCwuZQz3nhCql4z2dsjqvdtMu3hB
         9ibSnOanthiL0dfE9PHFbuPBFUDeNb8vvupFK67NE/kj/85DwcapnUVGY2lEvuygl4Wt
         gbazUrNKp16DYNayBH3ujbx1y+KGMgtZPpOwsueh3fiz3FAUivVV4YjaIs0QOJToQIrc
         Th8A==
X-Received: by 10.152.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr1748380lag.19.1380220240273; Thu,
 26 Sep 2013 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130926182309.GS20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4070
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4070>

2013/9/26 Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>:

> It should be noted that runit, and the runit replacements I've seen,
> are still quite bloated compared to what they actually could/should
> be, and are probably also lacking in robustness. I see them more as
> "the right direction" than the end goal.
>
> Rich

And what is your opinion about minit? It's written by runit author (fefe).

Daniel