From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3598
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andre Renaud <andre@bluewatersys.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: endian.h warnings
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:11:01 +1200
Message-ID: <CAPfzE3YdqOJ1GMd16FQfyZxW0mxVw3cy=Nq3k6BENp=a92jeSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPfzE3ZSbwgBi=YLaqJ0qvYYN8Hp9qFiQSx=QGA8MYZqJyYnQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130710022528.GV29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373425875 25272 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2013 03:11:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:11:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3602-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 10 05:11:17 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3602-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3602-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UwkoE-0006S7-Em
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:11:14 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21826 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jul 2013 03:11:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 21812 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2013 03:11:13 -0000
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=gStdpJnZKqDlgT8/NatmXF1T7TdUb+relpLs7T9Eowo=;
        b=ABFUwcR4djYWkMfcZBw/4cUedV9L+lOEFXQ4rfUB1IkITVxR34f/ylxoo+zFxX2CIp
         pXXQqEET1kg0DS2DeKVWoZOHvUAV97P9+m34Y/6GF6HDmNrU9w4DjUl4+4JV8jUj3fsE
         84GiR0DYvXSpMgpQZuBj+aV81K0iCKuDlOfeiadDWDk1Ge1TjrUuJKiSAOLMiTxQeQZM
         PeY6TesKu0TPe9MaRN28EuaoJVjmrqozN5/3pKjqig67NWa21NZZYqAgQG/YHUFSStX5
         ZWLqnXiE+ykV1d1NFzs+XiPtPqsdmAvNi2L831T9xPp+1N6F4Nt7RXJn2jEjtkdncHZt
         8Orw==
X-Received: by 10.60.123.51 with SMTP id lx19mr26667322oeb.105.1373425861905;
 Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130710022528.GV29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnT4lBfVXtoHbaaW+3eBgxKwdZnOa8DmymBwZyPJzKjAQgydbX/k5p9A93XBK54uXMPDJhW
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3598
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3598>

Hi Rich,
> I really don't understand why gcc is generating warnings for these; I
> thought it automatically suppressed warnings for system include
> directories, and even macro expansion text generated from macros
> defined in these headers. If that suppression is not working
> correctly, maybe we should work around these warnings. I agree it's
> problematic for users to get spammed with irrelevant warnings that
> decrease the signal to noise ratio of the compiler's warning
> generation.

You're right, this was caused because I wasn't correctly using the
musl-gcc wrapper script, so gcc wasn't aware that they were system
includes.

Regards,
Andre