From: "Érico Nogueira" <ericonr@disroot.org>
To: <musl@lists.openwall.com>
Cc: <monk@unboiled.info>
Subject: Re: [musl] $ORIGIN rpath expansion without /proc: code looks wrong
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CFS7S01DTPRR.RHXZ6C66ZIQG@mussels> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27df10f8-c044-e960-350a-d0a40b774bed@unboiled.info>
On Wed Nov 17, 2021 at 11:04 AM -03, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> Hello, I've encountered a case of a binary with an rpath of
> /some/meaningful/lib:$ORIGIN/../lib
> not starting up due to not finding /some/meaningful/lib/libxyz.so.
> ldd'ing said it's there though.
> And the library was found alright when I patchelf'd rpath to just
> /some/meaningful/lib
>
> I dug into musl code and came across that bit that checks /proc.
> Sure enough, when I tried mounting /proc, it started working fine.
> Yet the error handling from accessing /proc puzzles me:
>
> ldso/dynlink.c, fixup_rpath():
> l = readlink("/proc/self/exe", buf, buf_size);
> if (l == -1) switch (errno) {
> case ENOENT:
> case ENOTDIR:
> case EACCES:
> break;
> default:
> return -1;
> }
> if (l >= buf_size)
> return 0;
> buf[l] = 0;
> origin = buf;
>
> hitting that break like I had means zeroing buf[-1], right?
No. Because `l` is size_t (unsigned long), it's the biggest possible
value for size_t, and `l >= buf_size` will be true, which means the
function returns 0. This conditional also catches the case where
truncation happens in readlink(3).
Documenting this in a comment or changing `break;` for `return 0;` might
make sense, though.
> Could somebody take a look at this and double-check that
> this codepath makes sense?
It does, but it might not be as robust as you wish. fixup_rpath() treats
the RPATH entry as a single string, and does all $ORIGIN substitutions
in one go (what splits the string by ":" is open_path()). This means
that the entire RPATH entry containing $ORIGIN will be ignored if
/proc/self/exe can't be accessed, despite one or more of them not
depending on $ORIGIN.
> My attempts at comprehending it fail irrecoverably at this line.
>
> (CC me on replies, please.
> No nice context to provide, building my own toolchain at
> https://github.com/t184256/bootstrap-from-tcc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-17 14:04 Alexander Sosedkin
2021-11-17 17:00 ` Érico Nogueira [this message]
2021-11-17 19:25 ` Alexander Sosedkin
2021-11-18 19:15 ` Érico Nogueira
2021-11-17 20:01 ` Jeffrey Walton
2021-11-18 19:21 ` Érico Nogueira
2021-11-18 19:41 ` Alexander Sosedkin
2021-11-18 19:42 ` Jeffrey Walton
2021-11-18 20:30 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CFS7S01DTPRR.RHXZ6C66ZIQG@mussels \
--to=ericonr@disroot.org \
--cc=monk@unboiled.info \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).