From: "Érico Nogueira" <ericonr@disroot.org> To: <musl@lists.openwall.com> Cc: <monk@unboiled.info> Subject: Re: [musl] $ORIGIN rpath expansion without /proc: code looks wrong Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:43 -0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CFS7S01DTPRR.RHXZ6C66ZIQG@mussels> (raw) In-Reply-To: <27df10f8-c044-e960-350a-d0a40b774bed@unboiled.info> On Wed Nov 17, 2021 at 11:04 AM -03, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > Hello, I've encountered a case of a binary with an rpath of > /some/meaningful/lib:$ORIGIN/../lib > not starting up due to not finding /some/meaningful/lib/libxyz.so. > ldd'ing said it's there though. > And the library was found alright when I patchelf'd rpath to just > /some/meaningful/lib > > I dug into musl code and came across that bit that checks /proc. > Sure enough, when I tried mounting /proc, it started working fine. > Yet the error handling from accessing /proc puzzles me: > > ldso/dynlink.c, fixup_rpath(): > l = readlink("/proc/self/exe", buf, buf_size); > if (l == -1) switch (errno) { > case ENOENT: > case ENOTDIR: > case EACCES: > break; > default: > return -1; > } > if (l >= buf_size) > return 0; > buf[l] = 0; > origin = buf; > > hitting that break like I had means zeroing buf[-1], right? No. Because `l` is size_t (unsigned long), it's the biggest possible value for size_t, and `l >= buf_size` will be true, which means the function returns 0. This conditional also catches the case where truncation happens in readlink(3). Documenting this in a comment or changing `break;` for `return 0;` might make sense, though. > Could somebody take a look at this and double-check that > this codepath makes sense? It does, but it might not be as robust as you wish. fixup_rpath() treats the RPATH entry as a single string, and does all $ORIGIN substitutions in one go (what splits the string by ":" is open_path()). This means that the entire RPATH entry containing $ORIGIN will be ignored if /proc/self/exe can't be accessed, despite one or more of them not depending on $ORIGIN. > My attempts at comprehending it fail irrecoverably at this line. > > (CC me on replies, please. > No nice context to provide, building my own toolchain at > https://github.com/t184256/bootstrap-from-tcc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 17:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-17 14:04 Alexander Sosedkin 2021-11-17 17:00 ` Érico Nogueira [this message] 2021-11-17 19:25 ` Alexander Sosedkin 2021-11-18 19:15 ` Érico Nogueira 2021-11-17 20:01 ` Jeffrey Walton 2021-11-18 19:21 ` Érico Nogueira 2021-11-18 19:41 ` Alexander Sosedkin 2021-11-18 19:42 ` Jeffrey Walton 2021-11-18 20:30 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CFS7S01DTPRR.RHXZ6C66ZIQG@mussels \ --to=ericonr@disroot.org \ --cc=monk@unboiled.info \ --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \ --subject='Re: [musl] $ORIGIN rpath expansion without /proc: code looks wrong' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).