From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04ACB2367A for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:53:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 7408 invoked by uid 550); 12 Mar 2024 16:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 7368 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2024 16:48:48 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Thorsten Glaser X-X-Sender: tg@herc.mirbsd.org To: musl@lists.openwall.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20240312005150.GB4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4f5abddd-09f9-f05f-6cc6-719fc365b449@loongson.cn> Content-Language: de-Zsym-DE-1901-u-em-text-rg-denw-tz-utc, en-Zsym-GB-u-cu-eur-em-text-fw-mon-hc-h23-ms-metric-mu-celsius-rg-denw-tz-utc-va-posix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Subject: Re: [musl] loongarch64 atomics not working? Waldemar Brodkorb dixit: >lixing wrote, >> We've tested static and dynamic build mksh with commit id >> cbb8a0196aab53165a35339fd91ade599d184f both works ok. That=E2=80=99s great to hear! >Can you check with qemu-system-loongarch64? I use gcc 13.2.0, >binutils 2.42 and Linux 6.6.18 with the defconfig provided. >Qemu is also 8.2.2. Can you provide your QEMU_EFI.fd for download? Perhaps to distinguish between emulation/runtime and toolchain faults you could send each other the mksh binaries (if statically linked, otherwise probably them plus musl=E2=80=99s dynamic parts)? gl hf, //mirabilos --=20 FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh