From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 30526 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2022 23:24:28 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Nov 2022 23:24:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 23789 invoked by uid 550); 6 Nov 2022 23:24:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 21702 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2022 23:18:41 -0000
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 18:18:22 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaction.cc; s=key1;
	t=1667776709;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;
	bh=DM3rrfe4Kb+vn7I/2vrPEVQHS5yBRFaKwAMEHuMjO2c=;
	b=T4XI3A7tMB4PIeKjqukYvpZj5jH8RlvP202X/OhFGD+vd0Sg1WMQUmtF7W8nHfYO+QYXAh
	hnSaMOXxo34RjCUDsVNA5x1SFk0MAQDJ7xOxqwe4TJXw9teJumTewKI0lJ94js2GMAKf2h
	dVaeiI1uBwZaK9x7D95JoWv2RS/xHQA/Ljhr2+sItsd+JOGublhCjlM2JhxBknEEy8J15u
	oLppM40AoIC9PNA8vvYaDGHjyV5e2gQFDgqmBgRn7+XqgUgHByU7n0haXIqas8D+oWD9VI
	4PwiLXL/yBRQAVa3gH+ZN+1+C/Niyf1XXzDX9g/gx3Tx5P/fQ8EG7u5wG9JPQA==
To: bug-gsasl@gnu.org, musl@lists.openwall.com
Message-ID: <Y2hAvvoB2R3FQ9XN@serenity>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
From: Dmitry Bogatov <oht-tfnfy#tah.bet#i1@kaction.cc>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
Subject: [musl] Behaviour of strverscmp(3)

Hello.

While trying to building gsasl statically with musl library as part of
Nixpkgs distribution, I noticed that test built from tests/version.c
fails when built with musl library. After a bit of troubleshooting, I
can pinpoint the reason -- different behaviour of "strverscmp" from
glibc and musl.

Example code:

#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
	int value = strverscmp("UNKNOWN", "2.2.0");
	printf("%d\n", value);
	return 0;
}

Under glibc value "35" is printed (positive), under musl value "-1" is
printed (negative). Not sure what is the correct solution for the
issue, so I cross-post into two lists.

For now I plan to patch-out this particular test. Thank you.