From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32337 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2023 16:29:32 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Jul 2023 16:29:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19792 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jul 2023 16:27:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 19694 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2023 16:27:32 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1689265640; x=1689870440; i=nullplan@gmx.net; bh=L/4Q67c0njjJ+FJGuRDT56ChgePu6uCYmZifPXNrhs0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=mU4g/rZTsBQ8YUynvRfQRsWPNGPScTD9UKyzKPnufhc/wFyAWw54d5XIpPk9GXND66DkdN5 /kT8V8fPXl7uTDUoAbphjmAtwBTywIgv/ZFd8c5eiSd8ctszuCLasisISr/1UJneLEuZIAwwh zJyIW93GRvL12Bkgt9e4DOoecgszCs6gh7dtQyWEOrXUt80MXKVQ959/fjQl1W0JV3QuD4V+j 9JoOfqP/HyuTqR0S09kGrJC5O89njZYHYEl+00B4AEqnxAwhJXai7XNX33l9QKBT6N0YtN9rB Pdj+e+I0b01l9NIkQDBFUzuc4rwA1rnQESgloVOuL/ShWmXZfGnQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:27:19 +0200 From: Markus Wichmann To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: References: <20230712024804.GH4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230713015046.GI4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <7f435b07-ee08-8ed1-72a2-edb7354aa2f1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f435b07-ee08-8ed1-72a2-edb7354aa2f1@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nWvE/ugtAlC/m3HCFTuHegKcFDIA9/yyQG5CyIlvfB9FeT9UnaI S8r4qYTPaahrjFhzTXpNah5pTRi/KCLHLIm4NlLNbKPv4CumkEYBltvJnXKRFuJcyxWSsqD WLe7mk5li/IXp6HnX0RvxNFiQQTn8PAzro9gXUZuHb5dCMpC797rYiBfuSJnftll2AAFlfQ nROrGOt0LSMBEisf0jhSQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:o9gLx+AK0jo=;KxPFsQOxmMgtuoBM31fuG717NZd aDtCgrYQQW+qVgiDjpHz1lBQwTo+59Hyuv5DtU8DWrfN+k4h434Sv8EHf+p2tiFfVMQ418w4q l5PudijJ8xDklv0gGLIRXb782X+cZeKCteMEkjPggse6xsqL2U1quakCLWiSWS9y8eL6IvrpX 4D9fRgYdYIQ/y3+/dLyWyzYgFczxPcketWFXxA1fFWqaLV+akSrR3npP8GPy6sdlWi4OR7Phm fxR6BWgTfdG3Ffrmkfdd1PdfeN6r9cuK+1s3QAwhLYd4jDSL+qJinkxlRlN15ZNOFZaAr3J+o jFPhR2D79g9Te0fNCqC2e8VU4TubGzh+nYqT5HLAUA9LnWujzmGiyzdTS6GsshLltAHOKwiX6 pX01DrXHwsL2KLbY6K/R4aBgLsxHJaDA849w6XHvDgOUfMwtYEoFtdNgyatMr5SfwDmWv3pMj DR3QCD1i4ZUwS5yBZtlwGVo99lM4ztiVh0Y5jMMEyLmPzGDNHJZvzwxJw7Q5ijVa4VdZbvA44 btSRGAg8iFORaK32nJIMpmQrf+wcOvPLJr6Vyw/uU3DCXWqWxit22wW0Al5RSfnCyfatH8N5U 2HsREATvl6jvOSN8Z/Lo4RjWUzv2GcX5HiBW/151xKDR1YbCbEz2zxJWs4l/nOymF+uoppbLO 5LrVEdIes/Xdz8mjee8KGIlOuWcp0ue7TVYSAsRCesSjNGtduhSJQFgt/D1Zj3wtoXj7racmp upg3/WKMw0i2sJJ9XIDKTUQKbYpL2SqHY/4mrlHeMwj70Uy2ff+mURqxuoOJq/5/dtVD1Nx3A zKW+lHrsboSSdlYQR2aWfamtE3mcAGszD8kMss1q4C/gQ9ISC1P00ld+8weEcv2yA5t73Qla2 m8Jp8ETouzjvjbFeBEw1cE2XvJMPANx6zKIlo8FgIcXZ/drzq7tT9/w5YwWYXmgQr/qimkb+C rGSM8LzY930a5Po/giBbrOOweI8= Subject: Re: [musl] Difference in pthread behavior between glibc and musl Am Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:02:54AM +0200 schrieb Gabriel Ravier: > so I don't get you mean by 'It is not "explicitly recommended"': Reading comprehension, please! The sentence you quoted contains a condition; one that Rich already pointed out to you. The condition is not fulfilled; musl does not detect that the key is invalid, and therefore the entire thing is null for this implementation. Let alone that the sentence is in a section explicitly marked "informative" (as opposed to normative). Ciao, Markus