From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20D0A24469 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 23672 invoked by uid 550); 21 Apr 2024 17:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 23640 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2024 17:21:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1713720055; x=1714324855; i=nullplan@gmx.net; bh=XJxhnWdihJgN667WhoUkXQ5AQFqt3G6YoocyjWH7Xk4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To: cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id: mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=cEmt1/ChoecVJnRzonlpxO5GGeoS8pmsZgJb5n6UCxb1XAJcJWmj5PILfn1E1ary l56jd6sgMyWkhMhTLWOKZQvLDzm2j2v1oQOp09dTVGYua1ElxK7x7eXbGTOsFfqIg 2l9EHMnWMYyHBD8Yfjdrh+gzupKFjO3ZBtViN7FhjUlpyp1wb9OQgQJxxnyMyPqsR u2J4gZ3tnbdm+1OeUbmIYti3AQuS/wMa55ErIkTyx1nvcHcfj0MC8GSxm4dD+MPKj 2QgBXCB7yQNVgqgoH2ef8TStElcG14JlSV+HiUu+2F5rX8Xi9K5j9qHP5USfFW1+e 84JIGQiNCjN0EPRLaA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:20:54 +0200 From: Markus Wichmann To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: References: <3KDMGHI91MHTL.24XCHF6E4X1XG@mforney.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KTsDz+dWdPoL9s1prkyHbbuY/mCPCTLY1PioJaF5GI1cSWTwN2r nU/sa0owvEPv3M9Z5Z9r/71Ekm4wpjpfMnV4fMPw6TtlQRsisuaS1euRNdnVPyDswlfke8q IKZuNxrV1suL/xoRsEgD/7g/l5jsdQ+KVKn28xOlR2W0GdKJru3h2Z2f3Amu59zrXNdMNtO WFgxafkAKdbNEZsi0wajA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:TepVlATwH6Q=;bEXtYgqXObgyJ/JkNRVQMILPhZI ZvWHSRRBQAQDbw/DiVCAJ8ow3rfd7ah78fL5r7zos4FvPDnP4MIhHEkCliomLSaOFRUGImU4r P5R3L97ST7NGIufSdljoORp4iS/6yNWvitwfRw5Uexg8XUuRffmE+i4ayDND/OHnkm875js7p mdzJwkkSI46rBq+q9gFJfZN6qqZtteqkAoVpWcg0ycgHsrmGM4JyWy432VaCAAERicoupEiEi EHDGXDffSbw46qES8eAAY9HmxAI90O6ShNnxkvgd2VW9bcPKKnUg6Fpp1IJrdwcTaZNBf1CAk dUtoiygjWdBIc8N7IZ/V4+qqAurUA5++cCL96rPwfouaj2iOrRE3eI9zv1y6LCbpSx2Zyat2U 4DUzOYd/Iur3ySsEGj64jhbln1bvIqtyDoOrdANuUeocxhhd2IbLcvywmrCkGG3BGc68xWYCv nBaBIpBtrRJKlONKjWowJKjzLHdgklGhNl7TEC63zr/JeV7z0/yprOVlysPLcUKeCNeUtEldM LEjXuw3xmSamE3uw8VG1MXEBGeyJmmVPdJzSAy/SpFzHjZwnfOPJvAY4G/LJuTs5tgwSBgspW xCp2iSK60XL0fT6tIvBtexgbw69EM4ybCGkqifhG+txADdA9mmlLumFmgno5n3u/uGmCu2LY3 iBSQ3PaRQqQhwmF05n2M+mBjkMDyGRMy9YSZs68+PTbAayi9PPI9k7jWCQXqObptpb6UfyzGK 6YasfsjL7FGADKydkamKmPE6jbW+CqQtnw2NFqHb5hpmsU7xsLTlIb06FFbw8uGlsIcusbNgn qsPmHu2ZOMCWrL/o+pKPGWQukcKIZUlv4gQK3tGzZuwTDa0XEWsaeUsH3vUwg/XDu/ Subject: Re: [musl] Alignment attribute in headers Am Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 03:50:31PM +0000 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > I haven=E2=80=99t looked at the C11 one. C11's _Alignas can only raise alignment, not lower it. Alignment specifications with a lower number than the field already has are ignored. I can't believe the C++ guys screwed up so hard as to make lower alignment UB. Ciao, Markus