mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jens <jensl@laas.mine.nu>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: procfs stdio writev problem
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 20:49:50 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.10.1305052042240.18514@laas.mine.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK4o1Wy1M2jRW=T+1EhPU=sVq3TmNRHo9jSRftQu0i6uSwC7sQ@mail.gmail.com>


On Sun, 5 May 2013, Justin Cormack wrote:

> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jens <jensl@laas.mine.nu> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've noticed a problem when using bash linked with musl.
>>
>> laas:~# echo 60 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic
>> -su: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>>
>> laas:~# cat t.sh
>> #!/bin/bash
>> echo 60 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic
>>
>> laas:~# strace -f t.sh
>> ...
>> writev(1, [{"60", 2}, {"\n", 1}], 2)    = 2
>> writev(1, [{"", 0}, {"\n", 1}], 2)      = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>>
>> I'm guessing that musl uses writev in its stdio implementation.
>>
>> And I think the error is due to a simplistic implementation in procfs, that
>> parses each write on its own, and that the writev is split into several
>> writes.
>
> Looks to me at a quick glance like stdio needs something like (untested)
>
> --- ./src/stdio/__stdio_write.c~ 2012-12-01 22:56:34.156555480 +0000
> +++ ./src/stdio/__stdio_write.c 2013-05-05 10:59:49.856504883 +0100
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>  return iovcnt == 2 ? 0 : len-iov[0].iov_len;
>  }
>  rem -= cnt;
> - if (cnt > iov[0].iov_len) {
> + if (cnt >= iov[0].iov_len) {
>  f->wpos = f->wbase = f->buf;
>  cnt -= iov[0].iov_len;
>  iov++; iovcnt--;
>
> In the case where the kernel exactly eats the iov you need to move
> onto the next one rather than have a zero length write pointing just
> after the existing one, as that could be an invalid address.

In this case its not the zero length that is the problem.
The problem is that procfs treats each write (or apprently each part of 
the iov) as a separate operation.

So the first operation is "60" which is fine.
The next one is "\n" which is invalid.
So we get two operations instead of one.

The implementation in bash amounts to a printf("60") followed by 
putchar('\n');

The same thing in uclibc works as intended.

I guess I can patch bash, or use sysctl program.

AFAIK neither musl or procfs is doing anything wrong here, it just happens 
that a pure echo no longer works as it used to.

Cheers,
Jens

>
> Justin
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-05 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-05  9:16 Jens
2013-05-05 10:01 ` Justin Cormack
2013-05-05 18:49   ` Jens [this message]
2013-05-05 19:03     ` Rich Felker
2013-05-11  3:49     ` Rich Felker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.10.1305052042240.18514@laas.mine.nu \
    --to=jensl@laas.mine.nu \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).