From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id 15d24c25 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7911 invoked by uid 550); 22 Feb 2020 20:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 7893 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2020 20:22:09 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 23:21:58 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexander Monakov To: musl@lists.openwall.com In-Reply-To: <20200222195925.GK1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Message-ID: References: <20200114185058.GV23985@port70.net> <20200114185835.GG30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200206145156.GF1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200222195925.GK1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.13 (LNX 116 2015-12-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [musl] Q: dealing with missing removal of excess precision On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Rich Felker wrote: > Can you comment on these bugs? Now that the 1.2.0 release is out I'd > like to follow up with reviewing/merging these. Sure, but before I do that I'd like to understand better how the review process is going to work. In particular, wouldn't it make more sense to wait until after you make your round of reviews, so that your examination is not biased by what I reveal? Alexander