From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id 711fdae5 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 07:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28423 invoked by uid 550); 24 Jan 2020 07:10:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 28402 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2020 07:10:37 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: key0.esi.com.au: damianm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:10:23 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin To: musl@lists.openwall.com In-Reply-To: <20200124045554.GR30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Message-ID: References: <20200116193343.GP30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200117164143.GB2020@voyager> <20200118011535.GD23985@port70.net> <20200118053759.GX30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200118094015.GE23985@port70.net> <20200124011122.GP30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200124045554.GR30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [musl] Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C My nomenclature for [sg]etsr [sg]etcr [sg]gete need to have a bit more 'fe' to ensure they never have a name clash. Any suggestions? fe[sg]etsr fe[sg]etcr fe[sg]gete Is the last pair too close to fe[gs]stenv? Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer