From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26048 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2023 06:59:32 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Jan 2023 06:59:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11495 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jan 2023 06:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 30257 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2023 00:57:48 -0000 From: "zhoujingqiang (A)" To: "musl@lists.openwall.com" CC: liudongxu , "Yulu(Brooklyn,RTOS)" , Nixiaoming , Wangxu , qiuguorui , "wangyunhe (A)" Thread-Topic: MAXNS should be increased Thread-Index: AdkkjbKF10xNcPQpQOiDk/Hd6TTHjw== Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:57:34 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.67.109.132] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c11794d249654abd8f81cdeef6bc0330huaweicom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [musl] MAXNS should be increased --_000_c11794d249654abd8f81cdeef6bc0330huaweicom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Currently, MAXNS is set to 3 which limits the number of nameserver. It is n= ot enough to meet most people's requirements for private DNS servers. In my= scenario, my client needs to access the networks of six companies. Each co= mpany provides active/standby servers to obtain private domain names. Three= DNS servers are far from enough. Expect to increase MAXNS to 12 Glibc has similar open bug[1]. The concern is that changing MAXNS would cau= se an ABI break. Musl does not have this problem since __res_state is stub. [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D998211 I am not subscribed and want to be Cc'd on replies, thanks. --_000_c11794d249654abd8f81cdeef6bc0330huaweicom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

Currently, MAXNS is set to 3 which limits the number of nameserv= er. It is not enough to meet most people's requirements for private DNS ser= vers. In my scenario, my client needs to access the networks of six companies. Each company provides active/standby= servers to obtain private domain names. Three DNS servers are far from eno= ugh.

 

Expect to increase MAXNS to 12

 

Glibc has similar open bug[1]. The concern is that changing MAXN= S would cause an ABI break. Musl does not have this problem since __res_sta= te is stub.

[1]: http= s://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D998211

 

I am not subscribed and want to be Cc’d on replies, thanks= .

--_000_c11794d249654abd8f81cdeef6bc0330huaweicom_--