From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6066 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?0KDRi9GB0Yw=?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: libc.so segfaults on mips Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:48:04 +0800 Message-ID: References: <4971377a-43f4-4c82-bee6-635791bbe44b@email.android.com> <20140904073545.GP12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <7bb51525-1a3d-43e8-a567-7523ca3673c7@email.android.com> <20140904145701.GR12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <6a8992f1-0db3-4a4c-9686-92bd99b2f76a@email.android.com> <20140904155857.GT12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409852906 1986 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 17:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:48:26 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-6079-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 04 19:48:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPb8u-0003iu-9W for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:48:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32428 invoked by uid 550); 4 Sep 2014 17:48:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32420 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2014 17:48:19 -0000 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6066 Archived-At: 5 сентября 2014 г. 1:17:57 KRAT, Rob Landley пишет: >I have the same problem in my aboriginal linux toolchain, which is >also the last gplv2 releases of gcc and binutils. (It's not exaclty >being ignored, but it's not working right either.) > >Fixing it is on my todo list, but at the moment I'm trying to get a >release out with the new wrapper and uClibc (and linux 3.15) to just >fix part of the problem and have the release version less behind. >(Fixing this shouldn't be all that _hard_, it's just out of scope for >this release which is _already_ hugely overdue...) > >Rob Ok then, I will pickup your fix when it will be ready, not a problem from now. Thanks to anyone replied!