From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/494 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aep Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: extended locale extentions Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:25:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20111010141704.GT24939@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318256664 27673 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2011 14:24:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:24:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: musl-return-495-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Oct 10 16:24:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDGmB-0003BC-T3 for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:24:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 17881 invoked by uid 550); 10 Oct 2011 14:24:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 17873 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2011 14:24:19 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111010141704.GT24939@port70.net> X-Sender: aep@exys.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:494 Archived-At: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:17:04 +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> that is isspace_l, isupper_l , etc... > these are standard, not c standard, but posix standard i used the wrong examples. what i meant was strtol_l, strtoul_l, strtoll_l, possibly others... > i wonder if a dummy implementation is ok > eg > #define foo_l(c, l) foo(c) > (maybe with a check if l is the c/posix locale) that's pretty much what is there. It's good enough for me (as my use case only has one locale), but i was wondering if its ok before i work on a patch.