From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 1328 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2022 15:11:23 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Sep 2022 15:11:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 29735 invoked by uid 550); 23 Sep 2022 15:11:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 29699 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2022 15:11:19 -0000
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:11:05 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
cc: =?UTF-8?Q?J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B_Gustedt?= <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20220923145843.GZ9709@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Message-ID: <f97b6867-dde5-be4d-97af-6f3648cabb5@ispras.ru>
References: <20220923162518.56284329@inria.fr> <20220923145843.GZ9709@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [musl] C23 implications for C libraries


On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Rich Felker wrote:

> One small note on wording: your usage of FTM differs from the one
> we're used to and that's in POSIX, where FTMs are macros the
> application defines to request some functionality or compliance
                         ^^^^^^^

> profile from the implementation, not macros the implementation uses to
> advertise features to the application.


Sure would be nicer to users if those were called "feature request macros"
instead.

Alexander