From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 18736 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2021 07:47:16 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Feb 2021 07:47:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20291 invoked by uid 550); 6 Feb 2021 07:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 20261 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2021 07:47:09 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,157,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="372264930" Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:46:56 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: musl@lists.openwall.com Subject: [musl] accuracy Hi, with the two patches from Szabolcs on top of musl-1.2.2, I confirm the results for acosh and sinh are back to normal for the whole binary32 range: Checking function acosh with MPFR_RNDN ... libm wrong by up to 2.01e+00 ulp(s) [2] for x=0x1.01cb98p+0 acoshf gives 0x1.e4ce84p-4 mpfr_acosh gives 0x1.e4ce8p-4 Total: errors=295917691 (6.92%) errors2=2708 maxerr=2.01e+00 ulp(s) Checking function sinh with MPFR_RNDN ... libm wrong by up to 1.83e+00 ulp(s) [2] for x=0x1.783ab6p-1 sinhf gives 0x1.9b038p-1 mpfr_sinh gives 0x1.9b0384p-1 Total: errors=72811936 (1.70%) errors2=31216 maxerr=1.83e+00 ulp(s) Paul