From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4601 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2021 10:48:38 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Feb 2021 10:48:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 25828 invoked by uid 550); 5 Feb 2021 10:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 25798 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2021 10:48:36 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,154,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="372188372" Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:48:24 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: musl@lists.openwall.com Subject: [musl] accuracy of mathematical functions Hi, I have updated my comparison with the newly released glibc-2.33 version. No big difference with the previous version, except that I included the "long double" format (aka ldbl-96), including for musl (see pages 13 and 15): https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/#accuracy Best regards, Paul