From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11054 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2021 06:34:59 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Feb 2021 06:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30593 invoked by uid 550); 6 Feb 2021 06:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 30575 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2021 06:34:55 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,157,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="372259627" Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:34:44 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: Szabolcs Nagy Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com In-Reply-To: <20210205201229.GD2447252@port70.net> (message from Szabolcs Nagy on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:12:29 +0100) References: <20210205200934.GC2447252@port70.net> <20210205201229.GD2447252@port70.net> Subject: Re: [musl] issue with sinhf Dear Szabolcs, > that one was for the acoshf bug, the sinhf issue was a bug > in expm1f (overflowed too early, although sinhf could have > used a less tight threshold that would have prevented this > causing an issue there) > > > [2:text/x-diff Show Save:0001-math-fix-expm1f-overflow-threshold.patch (1kB)] and that one fixes the sinhf issue: GLIBC : $ gcc -fno-builtin test_sinh_musl.c -lm $ ./a.out x=0x1.62e4p+6 y=0x1.ffe808p+126 musl-1.2.2 + above patch: $ gcc -fno-builtin test_sinh_musl.c $FILES $ ./a.out x=0x1.62e4p+6 y=0x1.ffe808p+126 Thank you! Paul