From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 6699 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2020 16:49:48 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Dec 2020 16:49:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 21549 invoked by uid 550); 4 Dec 2020 16:49:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 15826 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2020 16:38:10 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,393,1599516000"; d="scan'208";a="481201968" Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:37:59 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: musl@lists.openwall.com Subject: [musl] Accuracy of Mathematical Functions in Single, Double, and Quadruple Precision Hi, I have published a new version of my note, including results for double and quadruple precision, and also for bivariate functions (atan2, hypot, pow): https://homepages.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/#accuracy With Musl 1.2.1, the largest error I found in double precision is 14 ulps, except for the Bessel functions and the lgamma function. If something changes in future versions, please tell me so that I can revise my note. Best regards, Paul Zimmermann