From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4005
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <oblomov@freemail.it>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Problems itemizing
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:18:39 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <000001c092e3$1daecb80$a3ccfea9@nuovo>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394702 22019 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:38:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:38:22 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: "ConTeXt" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4005
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4005

Hello, I have some problems in setting up itemizations properly,
especially when using the italian interface.

First, I had a few problems understanding that key=value pairs
had to go on a different [...] block. Ok, I overlooked it in
the setup instructions.

Then, indentnext=yes seems to do nothing.

Now, for the italian interface:

\impostaelenco (<-> \setupitemize) doesn't do anything
(the same keys, passed directly to \iniziaelenco [\startitemize]
achieve the wanted effects); \setupitemize used in the same
situation but with the english interface works; and \setopsommingin
works too, in all interfaces. Why?

And by the way, in debugging the develping interfaces (and not
just that) I belive that warning messages for unused options
could be helpfull (check for typos on the user sides or
errors in the code).

Giuseppe Bilotta

Using Microsoft products is like 
having sex without condoms---but
much less pleasurable