From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2943 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Senteces Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:14:13 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <000901c032f6$3d5b2160$2f450e97@nuovo> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393714 12998 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:21:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: "ConTeXt" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2943 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2943 Hello, I just discovered a need for a particular treatment of sentences (speechs?) in some typographic styles. Precisely, in Italy, when a spoken sentence is longer that a paragraph, you usually put a guillemot at the beginning of every paragraph included in the sentence, and put a closing guillemot only at the end of the final paragraph. Moreover, you use guillemots at the beginning of intermediate paragraphs even when (alongside the american typography) you use --- to begin speechs. In some way, this behaviour can be compared to the french behaviour (presented in the Omega documentation) regarding the repetition of guillemots down the left side of the paragraph. In Italy it's easier, since it can be accomodated with an \everypar. Is it already implemented (in some hidden way), or do I have to redefine something to achieve this behaviour? Giuseppe Bilotta