From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13011 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Tim 't Hart" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: RE: Re[2]: CJK support in ConTeXt Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:50:29 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <000901c36cc3$b88f7de0$0a01a8c0@TIMBO> References: <523657689.20030827120717@iol.it> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1062007066 12682 80.91.224.253 (27 Aug 2003 17:57:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Wed Aug 27 19:57:44 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19s4YC-00087Y-00 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:57:44 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EAD10B97; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:57:41 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net (post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B409C10ACB for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:50:33 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [212.238.244.167] (helo=TIMBO) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19s4RE-000C3z-00; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:50:32 +0000 Original-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <523657689.20030827120717@iol.it> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13011 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13011 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > I happen to be in the e-Omega task force, so I'm extremely > interested in any bug report you may have on it. For the > moment, let's stick to the 1.15 version, which is the official > version. >=20 > First of all, which TeX distribution are you using, and what > does the e-Omega banner say? I know there are people using > e-Omega for production use, so you might want to see if there > is an upgrade available for your distribution. I first started to use e-Omega and ConTeXt with the fpTeX distribution, which had e-Omega 1.15 installed. Later I switched to W32TeX (a Japanese distribution) which had version 1.23. I just saw that a few days ago, = the maintainer of W32TeX stopped including version 1.23 and he is now using 1.15--2.1-RC1. Is that the newest version? I'll give that version a try. = I have good hopes for this version since I've heard you removed some bugs = from it. I'm sure that everything will go fine now. Please give me some time = to dig up my old e-Omega code from a dark corner of my HDD and I'll let you know how everything worked out! By the way, what is the best way to use e-Omega with ConTeXt? Is there anything I have to keep in mind? The last time I used e-Omega with = ConTeXt, I made the format with 'texexec --make --alone --tex=3Deomega en'. And = then use 'texexec --tex=3Deomega ' to make output. Is this still = the correct way? Anyway, thank you for keeping Omega alive. I always thought that Omega = was a great idea, but that the lack of a stable version ruined everything. But = now it appears that you have made it useable. Well, if my first tests work out great, then I'll know what I'll be = doing this coming weekend! :-)=20 My best, Tim