From: "Matthew Huggett" <mhuggett@zam.att.ne.jp>
Subject: ConTeXt or Omega?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:22:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000d01c2a291$94339000$0200a8c0@home> (raw)
Hi:
I know that some people are using ConTeXt with Omega. What's the benefit to
using Omega instead of a native ConTeXt module? Is it better to develop
ConTeXt's language handling capablilities (as with the Chinese package) or
use Omega OTPs?
Thanks,
Matt
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-13 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-13 10:22 Matthew Huggett [this message]
2002-12-13 10:52 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000d01c2a291$94339000$0200a8c0@home' \
--to=mhuggett@zam.att.ne.jp \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).