From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10122 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Huggett" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: ConTeXt or Omega? Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:22:45 +0900 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <000d01c2a291$94339000$0200a8c0@home> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039775020 25854 80.91.224.249 (13 Dec 2002 10:23:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Mmyp-0006ir-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:23:39 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB2010AF1; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:23:55 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp1.att.ne.jp (smtp1.att.ne.jp [165.76.15.137]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1604D10AE7 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:55 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from home (unknown [218.231.154.16]) by smtp1.att.ne.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id BDBCF156E0 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:22:49 +0900 (JST) Original-To: "ConTeXt Mailing List" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10122 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10122 Hi: I know that some people are using ConTeXt with Omega. What's the benefit to using Omega instead of a native ConTeXt module? Is it better to develop ConTeXt's language handling capablilities (as with the Chinese package) or use Omega OTPs? Thanks, Matt