From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11053 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Willi Egger" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: compound titles, lists and headers Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:23:33 +0100 Organization: BOEDE Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <002801c2d4e7$22798b80$0100a8c0@vademecum> References: <4C48346A-406D-11D7-92E9-0030659899AA@fiee.net> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045309259 16362 80.91.224.249 (15 Feb 2003 11:40:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18k0gk-0004Fm-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:40:58 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1ED10AE9; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:43:15 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9E10AE7 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:41:12 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from vademecum (a80-126-172-1.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.172.1]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id h1FBf9LK064554 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:41:12 +0100 (CET) Original-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11053 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11053 Hi Hraban, > But the code (fixed measures) is as ugly as the output. > The lines in the frames are set a bit to high, and the page number is > too low. > I guess it could work with linecorrection, but that always throws > errors (at least > if used in a \def). > > Any more hints? What you could try is the trickery in paragraph 4.19 pages 101 and following of the English Manual. There Hans presents possibilities to use different boxes with different alignment. I believe, that with the problem you deal you will have to make some 'low'-level definitions. Gruss Willi