From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8355 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Willi Egger" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: nested itemizations setup Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:48:38 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <002c01c21ad6$68caa630$0700a8c0@vademecum> References: <200206210938.12555.ishamid@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398767 26900 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:46:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "ntg-context" Original-To: "Idris S Hamid" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8355 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8355 Hi, You can setup itemize-levels indipendently: \setupitemize[1][.....] %highest level \setupitemize[2][.....] %middel level \setupitemize[3][.....] %innermost level Regards Willi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Idris S Hamid" To: Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:38 PM Subject: nested itemizations setup > Dear gang, > > Is there a way to setup, say, three levels of itemizations in a consistent > way? For example, can I set things up so that > > \startitemize > \startitemize > \startitemize > > \stopitemize > \stopitemize > \stopitemize > > is always equivalent to > > \startitemize[n] > \startitemize[a] > \startitemize[r] > > \stopitemize > \stopitemize > \stopitemize > > It appears from the manual that this has to be done each time manually which, > of course, goes against the TeX/ConTeXt philosophy:-) > > Best > Idris > > -- > Dr. Idris S Hamid > Department of Philosophy > Colorado State University > Fort Collins, CO 80526 > >